Date: 12/05/2009        Time Issued (Saturday  afternoon   5:00 pm)

 

T-Waves Current OUT-Look  for the various Indexes/Sectors

Index  Near-Term Intermediate Term Longer-Term
DOW Neutral/Bearish

Bearish

Bearish

SPX Neutral/Bearish Bearish Bearish
Nasdog Neutral/Bearish

Bearish

Bearish

Russell-2000 Neutral/Bearish

Bearish

Bearish

I’m still seeing smart money selling into strength time and time again; a clear indication of distribution. As such please take on LONG positions very carefully at these levels as the risk to being long at these levels is compounding every day especially in over-bought technology and consumer-cyclicals and retailers  Strap-yourselves, as it is sure to be another wild another wild rollercoaster ride!! The question is do you want a ticket to partake of this amusement ride     I believe we are close to another major inflection period for the markets, so please trade cautiously and be quick to protect profits.   Please remember folks there are usually 7-8 bullish (participants) to every 2+/- bearish traders/investors, so the propensity for bullishness is almost always stronger, as no one wants to be a party pooper, especially those funds that are playing with other people’s money as they attempt to pad their books into their fiscal-year end! However the reason that the market usually drops 4-5 times faster then it goes up is liquidity, when selling picks up is a contagion and the lack of buyers due to fear, can feed on itself very quickly like a plague or a quick acting cancer, as such markets plunge (normally) quicker than they go up!   

 


I'm still bearish right now (see my technical section below)....and I will utilize any bullishness on Monday to establish some longer term (2-4 month, Short positions *or Puts* as we would need to breech the relative near-tern highs for me to change my bias outlook....as such I'm looking to establish call positions and outright positions in the inverse leveraged funds....see a partial list below (we could also use a put-write strategy as well (example of a put-write play, we could write/sell the January 2010 SDS  $36 strike puts for $1.92 taking in $192.00 per contract, if they are pus to us at $36.00 we have a built in protective stop-loss of $1.92)....I'm also looking to SHORT a host of high-beta high P/E stocks as well (like  AAPL, AMZN, PCLN)   In a nut shell I'm looking for the resurgence of a very significant correction to take the bulls by the bulls in the days/weeks ahead and slap the bulls about...as the greenback is more oversold than at any time in history, way to many folks all leaning to the Short-side of the dollar market!!     See my in depth analysis below of various market conditions!

 

These instruments provide some extra-leverage when trading the various sectors  You could also look at utilizing the SHORT  2x-leveraged Pro-Shares                                                         ProShares-Website

  • FXP     (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the China-25 Index

  • RXD    (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the Dow Health Care Index

  • QID     (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the NASDAQ-100 Index

  • SDS     (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the S&P 500 Index

  • MZZ   (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the S&P Mid-Cap 400 Index

  • DXD    (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the Dow Jones Industrial Average

  • TWM  (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the Russell-2000

  • SKK    (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the Russell-2000 Growth

  • SSG     (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the Semiconductors

  • REW   (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the Ultra technology

  • SKF     (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the Ultra Financial

Emerging Markets BEAR 3x EDZ, Financial BEAR 3x FAZ, Energy BEAR 3x ERY, Developed Markets BEAR 3x DPK, Technology BEAR 3x TYP, Large Cap BEAR 3x BGZ, Small Cap BEAR 3x TZA, Mid Cap BEAR 3x MWN    Direxion link

For reference only LONG-2x-leveraged Pro-Shares

  • QLD    (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a Long the NASDAQ-100 Index

  • SSO     (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a Long the S&P 500 Index

  • MVV   (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a Long the S&P Mid-Cap 400 Index

  • DDM   (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a Long the Dow Jones Industrial Average

  • UWM  (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a Long the Russell-2000

  • UKK    (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a Long the Russell-2000 Growth

  • USD     (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a Long the Semiconductors

  • ROM   (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a Long the Ultra technology

  • UYG     (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a Long the Ultra Financial

Emerging Markets Bull 3x EDC, Financial Bull 3x FAS, Energy Bull 3x ERX, Developed Markets Bull 3x DZK, Technology Bull 3x TYH, Large Cap Bull 3x BGU, Small Cap Bull 3x TNA,  Mid Cap Bull 3x MWJ

 

The biggest rally in the greenback since January created a major stall and retracement in commodities and related stocks on Friday and mitigated the initial gains in equities experienced due to an unexpected drop in the unemployment rate triggering a reversal in sentiment and bets that the Federal Reserve will raise interest-rates/borrowing costs.

Odds that the Fed will boost interest rates by its June meeting increased to 53% from 31% a week ago, according to the Fed-head funds futures. The pro forma decent economic news was a boost for the dollar, because ultimately the Fed-heads will be forced to raise rates, and by raising rates you are going to push your currency’s value upward.  

Stocks rallied at the start of trading right after the bell after the Labor Department stated that the U.S. lost only a mere 11,000 jobs this past month, the fewest since the recession began and less than 1/10 the 125,000 expected.

If we believe this fuzzy-math-jobs-data…then the improving labor market must indicate that the nastiest deepest recession since the 1930s is now history, though it’s really too darn soon to say precisely what month it stopped if at all. Friday’s jobs report makes it seem that the trough in employment is just around the corner and may even be this month (I do not yet buy into this premise at all).  

The dollar has been pummeled this year, spurring what I see as a false real-demand for commodities as an inflation hedge and alternative investment, as the Fed-heads (who are just puppets for the large lecherous banks) have kept the benchmark interest rate near “0%” in what they claim has been a very successful endeavor and an effort to revive business and consumer lending following the worst financial crisis/debacle since World War II. Before today, the Dollar Index has plunged 8.5% while gold rallied 38.7%. The Reuters/Jefferies CRB Index of 19 raw materials lost just a mere 1.0% on Friday paring its 2009 rally to 19.1%. Gold as I had forecasted dropped significantly for the first time this week as the rising dollar spurred some investors to trigger their sell buttons on the yellow-metal on the heels of a recent new-high-rally setting a new record.  

Friday’s price action in the markets was very telling for me. The dollar carry trade remains in vogue and technicals continue to dominate overall money flows much more than fundamentals which seem to have been ignored for many months now. If you recall that the weakness in the greenback has facilitated a very large number of hedge funds, market speculators (GS, MS, BAC and JPM trading desks) and to a less extent hedge funds and institutional investors to borrow dollars and buy a variety of riskier assets (equities, commodities and other currencies and bonds); equities including a wide array of bonds a basket of commodities, gold, silver and other precious metals as well as other commodities have been the momentum playground of choice!  

On Friday after an initial Gap-up spike of 1.25-1.50% across the equity markets, these major market averages retraced and dropped into the red-zone before late day-dip buying adjusted the majors into the green….thanks in part to several upgrades in the semi-patch and telecom patch....now we have to ask is that a sign that investors were not believing in the details of the employment report (as I thought); or was it more. In fact, I believe the various index performance today was somewhat bullish late in the day (ahead of potential GAP-up-Monday) given the fact that the greenback as I had forecasted has started a potential relief rally (up 1.45%) and gold dropped 55+/- points.  

Bonds sure traded like they were bi-polar as they clearly had a crazy day with the market experiencing a mega gap-up on the jobs data and the thought-pattern was switched to one of new expectations that the Fed-heads as numb as they are will be hiking rates sooner than most had previously thought. The 5-year gained 12.0-bp the 10-year swung over 13-bp on the day ending up 10.3-bp while the 2-year had a wild ride of over 16.0-bps on the session. There was nothing but good headline-hyped positive news in the (still negative, from my vantage point) jobs report, and many were left wondering what path rising bond yield will have and their impact on housing and borrowing costs…. At first blush (headline driven) things did appear, to be trending better in the labor world (but fuzzy-math accounting trickery abounds), and with an upside surprise on the factory orders number the sentiment grew! The bond market will now turn again (after a back up in yields) will have to focus their attention to this weeks auctions, with the at-record $40.0 billion in 3-years and the reopening of the 10-and-30-years of $21-billion and $13-billion respectively.

The auctions will likely go off well as even with the so called better-than-expected” outlook on the economic horizon as the market is still looking at some year-end activity as well as all those pessimists who do not believe a couple of good numbers a robust recovery makes….and that these numbers are seasonally adjusted.  

The dollar was on a tear, taking a run at the 76 handle on the index and looking to clear 76.10 level before stalling…the euro was clobbered, trading back to the 1.4822 point and likely looking at the next level of support at eyeing 1.4696. The week ahead has some mid-tier data that will be watched as the market looks for added "positives" going forward but the auctions will be the main event.  

The dollar was able to stage a decent relief rally (or is breaking out of the falling wedge pattern, time will tell)  but nevertheless it posted a solid up day (finally), seeing the biggest run in nearly a year, as the market started seeing the Fed-heads potentially raising interest rates at a steeper, faster, and stronger clip. The greenbacks price action helped to weigh negatively on stocks, while commodities got clobbered with the CRB index off nearly 3.0%. Please remember that I have written and spoken about many times that the market was extremely-tilted as I say “way…way…way too short the buck” a carry trade that is extremely crowed and with the thin market expected for the remainder of the trading year (just 18-trading days left to the 31st) to year end the bond market is very-very vulnerable in my opinion to “crazy-wild-swings” This week could be very-tricky, with the a fair amount of data hitting throughout the week there will almost certainly be some hardcore trading action as well as just dealing with thinned, year-end trading volumes…like we see in equities.  

If rates do rise here and the dollar-carry trade deteriorates what does that do for the dollar and equities…I believe that it will do far better and it is doing, and we could see a multi-week rally in the dollar (good for our long UUP position) significantly more than we saw on Friday. If as I have forecasted the dollar improves, money will be stripped out of the proverbial commodity havens to which it ran into on the vast dollar-carry trade to protect against further drops in the greenback, and these havens have been gold, silver and various other commodities like crude, coal, food-stuffs, and agri-products.  

I still have my eyes most closely fixated on the greenback. As the greenback goes one way, I still believe the equity markets, bond markets, and commodities will go the other. 


Retail Sales are this week’s big data point….due to be release on Friday, December 11th, November retail sales are expected to show a monthly gain of 0.5-0.7% depending on the numbers used, against this past month’s (October’s) 1.4% significant increase; I believe that the risks are to the downside of the consensus especially after reflecting on the retail sales numbers released this week, retail sales should show no meaningful growth, with a potential downside bias.

I’m now after reflecting on the dismal retail sales numbers this past week a new wave of retail bankruptcies and closures is looming and they will hit the markets in my opinion right after the holidays…..I know that some of you will have a hard time believing in my premise as those on bubblevision have either down-played the data or ignored reporting on it but we have seen that retail-related bankruptcies have been on the rise all year. I expect significantly more heading into 2010 in the wake of downtrodden consumer confidence, very tight credit, Americans with vastly underwater mortgages and rising unemployment. These past several years has been very tough on the various number of retailers, their landlords (real estate REITs) and numerous suppliers, and I expects more of them to pack close up shop after the lackluster-sales drive them to despair after the holidays.

Of interest for next week is $135 billion in new debt being auctioned. There is $74.3 billion in 3, 10, 30-year notes/bonds and $61 billion 3 and 6 month bills. The Treasury will sell $40 billion in 3-year notes on Tuesday, $21 billion in 10-year notes on Wednesday and $13 billion in 30-year bonds on Thursday. Those 30-year bonds will be the most watched auction of the week.

What we need to start thinking about the start of confessional season starting this week and next as I expect 2009Q4 guidance (especially in the retailers and technology) to be coupled with earnings warnings. We are approaching the middle of December (time flies when your having fun) and this is the period where major firms (watch the banks stealthily play out their warnings) will start giving guidance updates for Q4. This is not as prevalent as in years past since most firms are beating earnings from massive cost reductions (lay-offs and expenses)..


We saw further economic contagions this past week that went underreported, that will weigh on the economy, retailers and banks as the total number of bankruptcies filed in the third quarter this year surged a whopping 33% and is at the highest level since early 2005, according to the American Bankruptcy Institute, they stated that 388,485 bankruptcies were filed during the past quarter, compared to 292,291 filed during the same period in 2008, according to data released by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. The report showed that new bankruptcy filings for the first 9-months of the year increased 35% to 1,100,035, compared to 841,496 filings during the same period in 2008.

The spike in bankruptcy filings for both consumers and businesses reflect the continuing effects of today's weak economy. With unemployment surpassing 10% and credit to businesses remaining extremely tight, consumers and businesses are increasingly turning to the financial relief of the bankruptcy-system. Bankruptcies are at the highest level since 2005, right before the Bush Congress passed amendments to the Bankruptcy Code, making it more difficult for average Americans to file.

  • The ABI report showed that business bankruptcy filings rose 32% in the third quarter of 2009 to 15,177, and filings for the first 9 months of the year totaled 45,510, topping the total 43,546 business bankruptcies filed in 2008…hum, how is this a market positive or economic positive! 

  • Personal bankruptcies increased 33% to 373,308 during the past quarter, led by a 42% hike in Chapter 7 filings, which totaled 265,721. The number of consumers filing Chapter 13 bankruptcies rose 15% to 107,142 filings in the third quarter, according to ABI.


On Friday Gold futures on the COMEX saw the biggest decline in almost one year, and plummeted to a one-week low on Friday, due to profit taking and the strength in the dollar (carry trade un winding) as the greenback rallied sharply on much-better-than-expected job data….we saw that silver and platinum both dropped as well.

A report from the Labor Department indicated the U.S. employers cut 11,000 jobs last month, the smallest monthly loss since December 2007 and much lower than the 130,000 losses economists had expected. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate fell to 10.0% from a 26- year high of 10.2% in October.

After the encouraging data, the dollar index, a gauge measuring the greenback's value against other major currencies, leaped more than 1.4% to a one-week high of 75.73 by the end of gold floor trading time, leading investors to sell off the precious metal to pocket profits after a huge rally in recent sessions. March silver was down $0.608 to 18.52 dollars per ounce; and January platinum dropped $44.50 dollars to $1,449.70 an ounce.


CRUDE in my opinion is looking ripe for a significant correction to the $53.00-$56.00 dollar level per barrel, hence why I have established a long position in the DTO (inverse leverages ETF “short”) and why I recommended short positions in HES, OXY, OIH, and USO (we have puts in the USO and OXY)! The contango situation is a very crowed dollar-carry-trade right now and if the carry trade starts to unwind this situation could deteriorate very quickly

  • The API data released on Tuesday this past week showed that showed crude stocks rose 2.9 million barrels during the week while Gasoline stocks rose 3.4 million barrels and distillate stocks rose 1.1 million barrels. Refinery utilization jumped by 2.6 percentage point to 82.2% of capacity last week, the API report stated.

  • U.S. crude oil inventories rose far more than expected last week (bearish signal) as refiners curtailed operations while gasoline stockpiles jumped on weaker demand for motor fuel, according to the EIA said in their weekly data release on Wednesday. Commercial crude stockpiles in the US gained 2.1% million barrels to 339.9 million barrels, the EIA reported stated. Meanwhile, gasoline inventories increased by a whopping 4 million barrels last week to 214.1 million barrels, four times the average estimate of a 1 million-barrel rise.

Also there is way too much pumping and storage in “Oil Tankers” and holding-facilities as for a while now, the oil majors and seasoned traders, trading-desks, hedge funds, pension funds and speculators with access to cheap credit (dollar-carry-trade) have been scanning the horizon of wider macroeconomic data for signs of a turnaround in the global economy that could support fuel demand which has been weakening and so far (out side of Friday’s hyped jobs pro forma data) no such data has been forthcoming, as demand is lackluster at best! Many times in recent months market participants have got carried away by a wave of macro and micro economic data and have lost complete focus of the underlying supply and demand curves regarding crude (basic economics). The recent crude inventory reports suggest that demand for crude and gasoline isn't even moderately strong. And as such crude prices are likely to come under some significant selling pressure as we close in on the end of the year because there is more than ample supplies of crude and weak demand continues to persist.

Unbeknown to those pumping crude on the various bubblevision networks as they are ignorant of real-facts, (as they are to busy hyping their own positions and books)….the various oceans continue to be the world’s biggest crude storage facilities as fleets of oil tankers (positive for tanker-firms) are just floating and its estimated that they are currently holding an estimated 110+ million barrels of crude products, most of which are distillate fuels like diesel and heating oil; while crude volumes in floating storage are estimated at around 35+ million barrels. Worse yet emerging nations and even those in OPEC are pumping crude at break-neck speed to try and capture the current rates, while demand wanes! 

As HeatingOil.com reported last month, there are currently 135 oil tankers at sea holding crude products until it becomes more profitable to sell them. This is in addition to the record amount of oil stockpiled in traditional storage. Experts expect demand for crude to pick up sometime in late 2010. However, the amount of crude currently stored at sea is so massive that it could meet all of next year’s expected demand growth, leaving onshore stockpiles untouched. A record number of tankers are storing crude and oil products, driving up charter rates to their highest since the first quarter of this year for some sectors. The number of tankers deployed for temporary storage jumped by 20 in a month to 149 by the end of November. They include 37 very large crude carriers, 17 suezmaxes and 95 long range product. 

That is why crude right now is in Contango! It basically means that a commodity like crude will sell for more in the future than it at the current “spot” price. This historically occurs when there is an oversupply of a particular asset/commodity. There is currently a very steep contango in the crude and heating oil markets due to the record high inventories of products and distillate fuels being stored at sea and on land.  

Crude players and speculators with access to cheap credit have been buying gas and oil, and storing it on idle tankers in sheltered inlets around the globe in the hopes of selling it at a higher price later into the future.

I read that near England there is a fleet of nearly 40 crude tankers, each with hundreds of thousands of barrels of crude and distillates that have been anchored several miles off the southeast English coast in recent months. The heavy traffic stems from near-record crude supplies (lack of demand) a by-product of this recession that is prompting producers to store crude offshore until they can find end-users. The price premium of crude contracts dated further in the future relative to near-term contracts has made it very profitable to buy crude, store it on a tanker for several months, and sell it later at a healthy premium. This contango affect has been heightened by speculative market players buying crude/energy contracts far into the future, as they place a plethora of bets that supplies won't keep up with emerging-market demand down the road because of political or OPEC barriers that could restrict production (a bet that with a surging greenback could be nastily unwound violently). 

Most are oblivious to this ploy/situation as their buying for storage at sea, dubbed “floating storage demand” by these physical traders, has created the illusion of real consumption in the end market (and this is not so, as the data has shown), but nevertheless this illusion until known or violated helps keep recent profit margins for distillates positive….which in turn has sent a false signal to refiners to keep churning out refined product! 

Refiners are reeling from the effects of a weak-demand (hence the pull back in VLO and TSO), as high-supply market as relatively high crude prices and low demand for refined products have cut deeply into their profit margins, leading to refinery shutdowns and layoffs. We saw that recently Valero, the largest refiner in the US, announced plans to shut down its Delaware refinery and lay off those workers.

Despite this, the US Department of Energy's EIA reports that the amount of capacity US refineries used in the last week declined 0.6% to 79.7%, when the market had expected the utilization rate to rise to 80.6%. The refinery utilization rate is significantly depressed compared with similar periods in previous years, when it has usually run in the range of 87% to 89% of capacity.

As we saw above the US which is still the world's largest energy consumer, when coupled with the latest data suggests that the US economy is still weakening somewhat more than previously projected (despite the hype and hopes). Rising crude and gas stockpiles in the US point toward lackluster demand and is an indication that many parts of economy may not be recovering as fast as initially anticipated; as these rising inventories and lower activity in refineries are pointing to depressed demand for fuel, which may be a reflection of recent signs of weakness in US manufacturing and services.


From my vantage point the path of least resistance for our equity market is that of profit taking as the path is fraught with land mines (bouncing Betties) this week, and investors and fund managers with a host of pent up profits will surely want to bookem then gat cut off at the knees and risk losing their bonuses.  Remember when in doubt CASH is always King/Queen. I believe we are closing in on another MAJOR -MAJOR significant inflection period for the markets (12-03-12-7), so please trade cautiously and be quick to protect profits, as they are only a good thing when you place them into your account..  We have a horde of economic data squeezed into this week, so there should be plenty of great trading opportunities! (see economic calendar below).....  If you are LONG please trade cautiously as I believe the large trading desks can smell blood in the water and the sharks are starting to circle.....The markets at least at first blush last week were ignoring dismal economic news. Primarily because bad economics news means the Fed is going to stay on the sidelines for a long time and allow the lecherous banks to borrow at near zero, and run up commodities to act as a tax on Americans/others as well.

Jobs….Jobs….Jobs….we are in the clear now, if we believe Friday’s report and all is well now right?

The headlines reflected good news in that on a pro forma basis we only lost 11,000 jobs in November (a huge surprise to me, as the hedonic data was reworked). The bad news that no one on the various bubblevision networks reported on was that Americans are remaining on the unemployed rolls (out of work) far longer that many have even remotely forecasted. The giddiness and initial excitement over the unexpected drop in the jobless rate contradicts the bullishness and underpins two troubling trends: {the labor force continues to shrink (making the numbers look better than they really are) and Americans are staying unemployed longer than ever.}

Looking at it another way, the long-term jobless now make up 38.3% of the unemployed population, not that far from the 41.1% accounted for by those out of work for 14 weeks or less. (The remainder are in the 15-to-26 weeks bracket.)

So while the recession's annihilation of jobs could be subsiding (key word = could) Americans are going to be facing a longer wait before the economy starts cranking out new jobs, and an even longer wait for quality jobs.

The U.S. economy lost 11,000 jobs in November (a major surprise to me) the smallest drop since the recession began nearly two years ago and the unemployment rate fell to 10.0% from 10.2% in October, according to the U.S. Labor department as reported on Friday. Over the previous 12 months, the economy was losing an average of more than 445,000 jobs a month.

But it's the missing and terminally displaced workers that I find most troubling; the jobless rate fell mainly because the labor force shrank by nearly 140,000 (as many good hard working Americans) just gave up looking for work entirely, many are so darn frustrated because jobs are so very hard to find (but the drop off was empirically great for the jobless number calculations). As people stop looking for work, that situation lowers the unemployment rate and gives a false impression of great news. 

I believe (put it on your calendar) believe that the unemployment rate is likely to resume its upward trend when people who had given up looking for work resume their search and others lose their jobs as I expect will accelerate after the New-Year, to 14.5-15.0% in my opinion.

Friday’s pro forma jobs report was extremely well timed: After reflecting on this release I have concluded that after reviewing the dismal retail-sales numbers released this week by the majority of large and medium retailers (the PPT the market-manipulators decided to help fuel the markets before a significant-selling-spree-started) as the markets needed a psychological boost to induce more spending….and as such this release came at a perfect time to help boost the confidence of consumers as we come into the core of this Holiday Season, as many will only focus on the headline reduction….as the pro forma reporting (BLS) announced a 0.2% drop-off in the November Unemployment rate, and this massive downward-drop happened with the November payroll employment numbers virtually unchanged. Now I’m no mathematical wizard but if the civilian labor force participation rate was little changed in November at 65.0%. then to get a 0.2% drop off in the employment rate we would have had to create 879,500 jobs….do anyone of your really believe this….if so I have several bridges in NY to sell you as their deficits are growing) 

Still from my research whish has been extensive in the en-employment and jobs arena a better-quality series that underpins the government’s employment and unemployment reporting is still showing various ongoing deterioration, in particular the ADP, Man-power data, the various help-wanted advertising and purchasing managers surveys are all showing continued signs of weakness as I have indicated.  

Its very important to us real-common sense folks that are left in this world (something that is so lacking now) to keep in mind is that the severity and duration of the current economic recession is basically unprecedented in the post World War II era, and as such has led to serious and massive fuzzy-math data distortions, particularly tied to seasonal adjustments. Such was noted recently by the Federal Reserve in some their data series, where patterns of sharp variations in reporting of activity a year ago (now being built into current seasonal-adjustment factors) are not even close.  

As I mentioned several months ago the drop in the reported unemployment from 9.5% in July 2009, to 9.4% in August (was then heralded as the trough by those on bubblevision) but I warned you all then that that was not the case as it was due to a huge pro forma seasonal-factors distorting the data (mistiming for retooling of automobile production cycle) and those distortions reversed in September and October.   

On the flip side the massive magnitude of Friday’s reported swing in the unemployment rate is reminiscent of another series of data (any you youngsters will likely not remember) that in late-1987 and early-1988, a similar pattern emerged where we saw sharp deterioration and then a sudden improvement was some how orchestrated for the trade deficit. Such was an effort to support massive central bank intervention in favor of the greenback! 

What happened with the November payroll data/survey (key-word is a survey) is another matter. Despite the announcement of a pending 824,000 downward revision to May 2009, which means a likely ongoing downward revision of 200,000 jobs per month to current monthly payroll estimates, September and October data were revised upwards, sharply, a typical-fuzzy-math ploy!

We saw that we need to expect revisions in January as “In accordance with usual practice, The Employment Situation release for December 2009, scheduled for January 8, 2010, will incorporate annual revisions in seasonally adjusted unemployment and other labor force series from the household survey.  Seasonally adjusted data for the most recent 5 years are subject to revision.” 

In the interim, the unadjusted payroll levels revised upward in October by 103,040, and the October adjusted level was revised higher by 159,000. The jobs-loss data has been consistently understated, now the losses are being overstated but back-dated to make the current months look better. 

As such I must conclude that the November Employment/Unemployment Report was quite distorted.  From peak-to-trough (the peak month December 2007; the current month of November could be the trough of the current cycle), payroll employment has declined by a seasonally-adjusted 7,156,000 jobs, or by 5.2%. Net of the pending benchmark revision, the peak-to-trough decline likely has been closer to 10 million jobs or 7.2%. 

I was very perplexed when I looked at the Household Survey as this is usually statistically-better, as it counts the number of people with jobs, as opposed to the payroll survey that counts the number of jobs (including multiple job holders), it some how showed employment rose by 227,000 in October, versus a decline of 589,000 in September…this made little sense to me; this data was likely very distorted….stranger yet the October 2009 seasonally-adjusted U.3 unemployment rate showed that the three-moving average for the seasonally-adjusted series was 10.01% in November versus 9.90% in October….hardly positive and stranger yet the broader November U.6 unemployment eased a tad to an adjusted 17.2% (while the unadjusted numbers increased to 16.4%), from 17.5% (16.3% unadjusted) in October. Now lets use a little common sense as when we add back in the excluded long-term discouraged workers back into the mix of those unemployed, unemployment rates increase to 10.5%.   

So in a nutshell Friday’s jobs report clearly doesn't match up with other jobs data releases we have seen this past week as Friday’s report had me scratching my proverbial head as I tried to decipher and dissect how other labor data could be so divergent from the fuzzy-math pro forma government data, as we saw on Wednesday that the ADP reported private payroll lost 169,000 jobs in November; while the Monster Employment Index, which measures online job demand, dipped slightly from October's reading. And the ISM manufacturing and service reports showed that employment components of the index dropped (ISM services employment component increased only a tad to the employment index rose to 41.6% from 41.3%, while the manufacturing employment index dropped to 50.8% from 53.1% in October)…I was shocked on Friday the reported payroll data bore little resemblance to any other anecdotal data concerning the labor market, including the ADP survey, which is based on hard data from a much wider sampling of payrolls than the government's pro forma survey. 

Also troubling was the fact that the unemployed are finding themselves out of work for longer than ever, as the data indicated that an average worker is out of work on average (28.5 weeks) or more than 6-months. The ranks of the long-term unemployed grew again last month, as 293,000 unemployed workers saw their unemployment period push past the six-month mark. Now, nearly 6.1 million workers have been unemployed for 27 weeks or more. As job losses narrow employers will still be hesitate to hire, average unemployment durations will lengthen. Nearly 4 in 10 unemployed workers are among the long-term unemployed. The reality is that the recession (yes recession, as I have yet to say it’s abated) has put a massive dent in the labor market which will take in my opinion many years to rejuvenate.  

I have repeatedly warned that our economy (especially the labor-market) will be the weak-link, especially since 70% or better of our GDP is connected to consumer spending! So even when employers start hiring again, it will be a long time before the economy feels as good as it did in 2007…likely 3-5 years; as out economy has shed 7.9 million jobs since the recession began…and it could take 5+/- years to regain what was lost, and even longer to replace the quality-jobs. Friday’s data was a very-bad interpretation of our employment-situation as it underestimates the magnitude of the black-hole in the labor market because population growth continues unabated and this data has yet to be reflected., so according to my data and its substantiated by (Harvard university) we must now create nearly 11 million jobs just to restore the labor market back to where it was before the recession began a monstrous feat. That equates to creating 305,500 jobs every month for the next 3-years. The stark reality is that we are still many years away from getting back to full employment. At a best case scenario Firms may be close to stopping the Chain-Saw Al-Dunlop method of slashing and burning workers, they will be very slow to rehire as it would negatively impact their bottom lines, and to do so in a deteriorating demand environment for their products and services it would not be a prudent decision!

November Employment Data by sector:

  • Manufacturing dropped 41,000

  • Construction dropped 27,000

  • Retail dropped by 15,000 when on a seasonal basis it should have been up 125,000

  • Leisure and hospitality, was down 11,000, again on a seasonal basis it should have been up!

  • Government hiring ticked up 7,000

  • Temporary help services accounted for a huge increase, adding 52,000 jobs and this temp hiring number was the largest jump in five years. The trend is important. Temporary hiring is not always a harbinger of broader employment, since firms normally bring in temp workers to eliminate overtime and to avoid the costs associated with full-time employment (health care and other obligations). For instance FedEx hired over 35,000 seasonal workers and UPS more than 50,000. My UPS driver has had a different helper every couple days for the past 3-weeks due to having the staff reduced dramatically.

    • There is some slightly discouraging news in the Temporary jobs influx as temporary help services employment increased by 52,400 in November; while at first blush it's good that firms are utilizing temporary workers but they of course tend to receive significantly lower wages and they as a result have higher savings than regularly employed full-time workers, as such we could see a drop in aggregate spending if these firms continue to rely on temporary help...resulting in lower discretionary consumer spending!

  • Health care and education, gained 40,000

  • Professional and business services, a strange divergence gained a whopping 86,000 jobs, after gaining 218,000 in October…a strange occurrence

A broader measure of employment, which includes people who are working part time when they want full-time jobs and those who've stopped looking for jobs but want to work, also showed significant improvement. This measure of underutilization of the labor force fell from 17.5% to 17.22%. 

In November, the signs of a holiday/seasonal uptick were in place as the average workweek for production and nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls increased by 0.2 hours or 12-minutes to 33.2 hours; while the manufacturing workweek increased by 0.3 hours to 40.4 hours. Factory overtime rose by 0.1 hour (6-minutes) to 3.4 hours.  

However the average American despite the increase in hours and overtime is falling behind the inflationary 8-ball as In November, we saw that the average hourly earnings of production and nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls edged up by a mere one red-cent or 0.1% to $18.74….and over the past 12 months, average hourly earnings have risen by a mere 2.17% while the average weekly earnings have risen by a mere 1.6% due to the decrease in worked-hours per week!

How is this bullish?      Some experts like Cramer and Kudlow have repeatedly stated that the housing market has already bottomed (back in May), but one statistic indicates otherwise and defies their so called logic. The portion of U.S. homeowners who are “underwater” on their home loans (that is, they owe more on the mortgage than the home is worth) surged to a whopping 24.5% in the third quarter, or almost 10.8 million households, according to First American CoreLogic, a real estate research firm. Many of the underwater homes will ultimately end up in foreclosure.  Of the 10.8 million homes underwater, nearly half have a mortgage that is at least 20% higher than the home’s value (a huge negative contagion as this amounts to almost 6-million homes), according to the data compiled by First American CoreLogic. More than 520,000 of these homeowners are already in default on their mortgages. This is a huge over-hang of risk in the mortgage markets that no one is talking about or addressing.  Some homeowners who are underwater are fully capable of paying their mortgages, but they are in the elite group or top-wage earners that are ditching their homes anyway to the tune of 590,000


Well-worth the look.......It was strange to read this week that Treasury Secretary Geithner disputed claims by Goldman Sachs executives that the bank could have survived the financial crisis without government help and said it and other Wall Street firms should show some restraint in handing out bonuses this year…the words are lacking conviction though! 

He sated that “It is very important that we change the way these executives are paid, the form of compensation, this year,” “We have to end that era of irresponsibly high bonuses.”  President Obama has blamed compensation tied to excessive risk-taking for fueling the deepest financial crisis since the Great Depression. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan investment banks are set to pay record bonuses this year, despite the markets being hit hard….what’s interesting is that the markets are significantly below their 2000 levels and will post a loss for the decade of investing unless we see a miracle run into the end of the year….so after 10-years of investing from 2000-2009 you would have negative returns, however Wall-Street has been very enriched, as collectively bonuses paid out have risen compounded by 805% in the past 10-years! 

Goldman the poster child for insider-playing set a Wall Street pay record in 2007 when their compensation totaled $20.2 billion, including a mere $68.5 million for chairman and chief executive officer Lloyd Blankfein, but its expected that bonuses will vastly eclipse that make this year! 

This week Geithner, stated that many if not all of the too-big-to-fail banks could have failed  stating that the entire financial system was at risk at the height of the crisis, including Wall Street’s biggest institutions. “None of them would have survived” had the government stood aside and let the crisis run its course, he said. “The entire U.S. financial system and all the major firms in the country, and even small banks across the country, were at that moment at the middle of a classic run, a classic bank run.”


 

Technically Speaking

Weekend  Weekly Analysis         12/07/200

I am seeing several things happen across various sectors that has me very perplexed. One is the Apple deterioration and RIMM decline, another this year-end-airline rally out of the clear blue sky and lastly what the heck is happening in chip-land and semi-land as the recent chip/semi rally alone has kept a significant floor under the Nasdog as the semi rally last week was stealthy and it was substantial as the Semiconductor index rocketed over 8.1% for the week (and the fundamentals are crummy as many firms have experienced double bookings in my opinion). You would think somebody raised the all clear flag you can press into the semi/chips into the end-of-the-year the momentum is clearly the bulls to lose.. The SOX has significant OHR at 346-350 and if the bulls breech this level to the upside they could be off to the races (I will be shorting 350+/-)  semi sector has suddenly caught fire as we head into year-end.

 

We have consistently seen these past weeks that the stock market has been on a consistent bullish run since it bounced off the lows in March 2009. As stocks (especially high-beta and crap-stocks that have been placed on the HTB-lists) keep hitting new highs for the year, driven by the prospects (hopes and prayers) of a so called vast and global economic recovery, and many value investors like me are more than concerned about these lofty valuations. The P/E ratio on the SPX, for example, has risen to its highest levels in many years (depending on the calculations 27, 39 and 56). In addition, many once highly sought after dividend stocks, which were once selling at very attractive valuations just a few months ago, are now very expensive.

There are several ways that the market could correct this imbalance. First, since the market is typically a strong indicator that predicts contractions and expansions in the real economic cycle much better than most economists, the current bullish trend could be a forecaster of real economic growth if it were not for the direct massive manipulation (dollar-carry-trade, the every-manipulative “HTB” hard-to-borrow-short lists, the anemic volume vs. historic volume induced by the propriety trading desks and the vast-chase to maintain/catch up to market performance by the fund-managers etc to name a few). Historically a real recovery for end demand would lift earnings, decrease unemployment and bring valuations down to a more reasonable level, without causing any pull-back in the indexes or stocks. If the market is way ahead of itself however (as I believe) it could easily pull-back after the chase for performance ends; or the carry-trades unwind! I believe we are very close to the latter as after 60-70% or pent up profits (more for various equities (just look at the 6-horsemen-technical section below) a significant pull-back is warranted which would bring valuations to more reasonable levels.

Another option to consider is that I’m dead-ass-wrong and that this is truly a masked mega bull-market and that the market doesn’t correct but keeps roaring higher, propelled by expectations of stronger corporate earnings (see the section on corporate earnings at the end of the weekend report). As the hype goes when earnings rebound which they surely will stocks won’t look as expensive as they do today.  The indexes could continue climbing the proverbial wall of worry far longer than anyone could stay sane (I remember signaling a bubble top to the markets in November of 1999, but the Nasdog and indexes surged for 4+ months thereafter before collapsing).   I will probably miss the last throws of this rally, if it continues as I did then as I do not always have the stomach to play hot-potato (better know as the greater fool theory of investing) If the indexes were to keep going higher in a straight parabolic line and if the Dow and the SPX surge in the process, I might for a bit be kick myself in the ass for “missing the proverbial train” but like happen in 1999-2000 and 2007 I will eventually be proven correct and I will hopefully be savvy enough to reap the vast rewards of my analysis.

 


Even after the stunning stock market losses people were suffering at this time last Thanksgiving and now we can reflect on the tremendous gains the market has bestowed since the March lows. Yet for those poor folks who closely watch the fate of their money that they put into 401(k)/IRAs the gains of the past 12 months have failed to provide much solace. As folks who blindly followed wall-streets advice and invested money at the start of this decade in the SPX still have 25% less of it, excluding dividends of course which have been evaporating an alarming rate!  Many Americans remain deeply worried about their money and have grown increasing mistrustful of Wall Street and the government leaders entrusted to watch over the financial systems.

This sentiment may weigh on the equity markets in the future: I believe that this rally is very fragile, and cash from individual investors and others is desperately needed to build on it (what I so often refer to as a new round of bagholders).  After two 50+ percent sell-offs in the stock market in less than a decade (Dot-Com bubble bursting and then the Credit-Debacle), a near miss with anther depression and an unrelenting unemployment rate that keeps crawling higher, folks do not feel safe at all to re-enter the shark infested investment-cesspool, so where is the next round of bagholders going to come from? 

Those on the various bubble-vision-networks want us to believe that in general investors should be acting like they are on the top of the world after this year's monster relief rally from the March lows. But as many Americans stand back and compare the stock market rally to that of the actual economy (the economy where they reside) an atmosphere of distrust as once again those on Wall Street reap the huge rewards (made with taxpayer and other people’s money) and the average American doesn't get anything of substance once again; as such there is I believe a growing sense of unfairness and bewilderment.

The reluctance to trust Wall Street and the stock market has shown up in overall investing behavior. To observe individual investors, I like to watch the flow of money in and out of mutual funds. During the market downturn between October 2007 and March, investors pulled about $215 billion out of U.S. stock funds, according to TrimTabs Investment Research. And early in the current rally, investors put about $30 billion back into the stock funds…a huge disproportion of funds. But since then, the money that went into the stock funds has been started to be withdrawn, and investors have preferred the relatively lower-risk bond funds, pouring in over $340 billion this year.

 


Since this bear-market leg has started we have experienced 2-distinct and significant relief up-waves (wave 1 and 3 of a 5-wave pattern) and now we are embroiled in what I believe is the third (wave 5) and last wave up in this corrective pattern what I believe is a (B) wave up and I believe we are very close to finishing this up-wave!

According to my wave analysis the 1st sub-wave of the (B) corrective wave up was (a) which lasted 68-69 trading days from 3/6/09 to 6/11/2009….thereafter the second wave (b) down lasted from approximately 6/11/209 to 7/8/2009 a mere 18-trading days….and this was a very shallow retracement….here is the tricky part if wave (c-up of the B up corrective wave) tops in the next 5-10 trading days (likely in and around my next inflection period (11/6 to 11/13, we have a weekend and a holiday Veterans day on the 11thin the mix) it would mean that the (c) wave lasted approximately 68-up-days plus 18-down-days or 86+/- days now not all Elliot-wave patterns are exact-linear-counts but I would pay particular attention to the 11/9/2009 date as it would be 86-trading days from the 7/8/2009 bottom!      

Now for my bullish friends….I am issuing a serious red-flag-warning as if I’m correct and I believe that I am, when the up-leg of this (B) relief rally is completed…we will become embroiled in a very-nasty (many will be in the land-of denial) plunge, and this will be the third leg of this bear-market super-cycle-down-draft, and this plunge will catch many if not all of the perma-bulls in a state of shock and utter denial…I believe that history will be repeated and we will unfortunately plunge our economy into a deep and protracted recession (hopefully not another great-depression) 

VOLUME on the bullish side is worsening as the days wear on.....When I see decisive breaks below the bottom boundary lines of Rising Bearish Wedges for the Dow, SPX, and NDX I will be announcing that a major/major top is occurring. I’m also seeing increased bearish divergences between price and actual market breadth, price and volume, and price and momentum indicators that I follow for longer-term significant market moves. Please watch the weekly MACD indicators which are showing very distinct signs of respective topping patterns in the various indexed and are now starting to curl over which is a very bearish signal.  The concept behind MACD is fairly straightforward. Essentially, it calculates the difference between an instrument's 26-day and 12-day exponential moving averages (EMA). Of the two moving averages that make up MACD, the 12-day EMA is obviously the faster one, while the 26-day is slower one. In their calculation both moving averages use the closing prices of whatever period is measured, in the sector I watch for longer term moves (I use the weekly chart). On the MACD chart, a nine-day EMA of MACD itself is plotted as well, and it acts as a trigger for buy and sell decisions. MACD generates a bullish signal when it moves above its own nine-day EMA, and it sends a sell sign when it moves below its nine-day EMA


When the U.S. stock market is flashing mixed and diverging negative signals like it has been lately, I an now turning my attention to exploring for decent entry prices for stocks that I wish to own (those with dividends and the ability to write covered calls on, a process to generate additional income while I await their consolidation and subsequent move higher.  I'm looking at the respective 100sma and more likely 200sma moving averages as potential reversal points for the sell-off I'm expecting to enter into reversal long-plays.

Remember, that when embroiled in a significant selling period when almost everything is being sold-hard, is when you must be a contrarian investors and traders and pull out your favorite COF/MA/V stock-market credit cards and become buyers (we also must be aware that the wall-street-pickpockets/thieves for the most part....have a vested interest in running this market into the end of the year if they can)

We want to be very selective in our buys and not buy just any old hyped beta stock.  Prudent investors must do their research on the stocks they're interested in buying, and then they snatch them up when the window of opportunity is open and they are selling at a discount.  I do the majority of this research for my subscribers, so they can then focus on what/when and how to buy. 

The market is driven by hedge funds, mutual funds and by mega large trading desks (which  I believe should be illegal) of the likes of Government Sachs, MS, BAC and the like…and this past year along 33-40% of market volume has been routinely attributed to program trading at Goldman Sachs. I have no idea if that GS claim is true or not but like an urban legend the story continues to make the rounds.

On a pull-back I am looking for the following retracements in the major indexes, and this is based on my experience and technical analyst; remember that I did call the March bottom several days in advance of the move. The indexes should as a minimum retrace 25-33% of these recent parabolic moves, and they could easily plunge to 50% of their lows hit in March I have outlined the various retracement levels below. 

Index Relative High March Low Spread Fib 23.6% Fib 38.2% Fib 50.0% Fib 61.80% Fib 76.40%
Dow 10,513.00 6,470.49 4,042.51 9,558.68 8,968.88 8,491.75 8,014.61 7,424.81
SPX-500 1,119.15 666.79 452.36 1,012.36 946.36 892.97 839.58 773.58
SPX-100 520.03 317.37 202.66 472.19 442.62 418.70 394.78 365.21
Nasdog 2,204.00 1,265.62 938.38 1,982.48 1,845.57 1,734.81 1,624.05 1,487.14
NDX-100 1,814.20 1,040.62 773.58 1,631.58 1,518.72 1,427.41 1,336.10 1,223.24
Russell-2000 625.02 345.01 280.01 558.92 518.06 485.02 451.97 411.11
Transports  4,059.00 2,134.31 1,924.69 3,604.64 3,323.83 3,096.66 2,869.48 2,588.67
SOX 338.25 188.21 150.04 302.83 280.94 263.23 245.52 223.63
SPY 112.50 67.10 45.40 101.78 95.16 89.80 84.44 77.82
DIA 105.27 64.78 40.49 95.71 89.80 85.03 80.25 74.34
SMH 27.40 15.64 11.76 24.62 22.91 21.52 20.13 18.42
OIH 132.39 64.65 67.74 116.40 106.52 98.52 90.52 80.64
XLE 60.56 37.40 23.16 55.09 51.71 48.98 46.25 42.87
XLF 15.76 5.88 9.88 13.43 11.99 10.82 9.65 8.21

 

As I have pointed out in my technical sections…..I’m have been closely watching the various Rising Bearish Wedges in the major indexes and especially the high-beta momo-favorite plays for the large trading desks. They are getting very close to completion….and the downside target are at a minimum 50-60% retracement of this parabolic move off of the march lows…and if the selling gets nasty the patterns could easily retrace 100% of the march to October moves.

 

The Dow gained 22.75 points on Friday and  only 78.98-points for the week....ending the week at 10,388.50 in a moderate volume environment which was controlled by prop-desk-trading programs and hedge-funds/mutual funds painting their books as they ready to close them for the year.......The index has been on a parabolic ramp since the March 6th lows (6449) producing a stellar rally of 4,067+/- or 63% in just 9+/- months a very remarkable parabolic bear-market relief rally (I'm still expecting a pull back of 9-15% in the next several weeks from the recent relative high of  10,515) looking for a test of the 9,050-9,125 level.....if we see subsequent selling on Monday....there is little real support till we reach the 10,230 level the 21ema (*10,298)....we have the weekly 50sma looming thereafter at 10,040+/- and thereafter  (the October 2nd low of  9,430 is a pivotal level for the bears to seek out like a homing missile......If the bulls return on Monday they will look to re-take 10455+/- thereafter we have OHR at  10515...thereafter the weekly 200ema for the Dow comes in at 10539  this is where the Dow could  run into significant wall of OHR.   The Daily Dow chart looks week, as volume has come in on the sell-side (smart money selling into strength is my thought....the weekly chart is still displaying multiple negative divergences and has signaled a SELL-signal (the signal is moot now that the transports have made a new-high *Dow-theory*).....The weekly charts are close to forming the top side of a Diamond-topping pattern?. Diamond patterns usually form over several months in very active markets. The Diamond Top pattern occurs because prices create higher highs and lower lows in a broadening pattern. Then the trading range gradually narrows after the highs peak and the lows start trending upward. The Technical Analysis occurs when prices break downward out of the diamond formation?.....Consider the duration of the pattern and its relationship to your trading time horizons! . I still believe we could see a significant pullback as we have a bearish crossover on the weekly charts, and a bearish drop out of the rising wedge formation.  I'm also seeing increased bearish divergences between price and actual market breadth, price and volume, and price and momentum indicators that I follow for longer-term significant market moves. Please watch the weekly MACD indicators which are showing signs of topping and are now starting to curl over which is often a very bearish signal, as it was during the market top of 2007.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The DOW-Transports....was a nice winner on Friday (thanks to surging airline plays and rails) gaining 87.22-points, and for the week it gained 178.92 points  (the index closed out the week at 4,101.76) and the index has breeched to the upside  the 100Wsma at 3972 and the Triple top area at 4060+/- a bullish development this week on weaker crude and a host of upgrades for the airlines and transports (even though the fundamentals do not warrant the bullishness) (we need to see if its only a temporary breech or something bigger!) The Transports now this week have confirmed the bullishness in the Dow according to the Dow-Theory.  Its worth noting that the up-days are trading at 89% of the 30-day average volume these past 2-weeks while the down days are trading 152% of the 30-day average volume, a bearish divergence worth watching.... If the bulls somehow managed to muster some buying interest and return in a buying mood on Monday look for them to attempt to retake OHR  4,175 thereafter 4,225 (we have a have brick wall of OHR 4,255) if crude prices continue to move lower in response to weaker economic conditions and or a stronger dollar the transports could find some mixed tonality......if the bears return in a ravenous mood; they will likely attempt to retest the the 3,990+/- level thereafter there is support thereafter 3,860-3,870 level if this level fails the bears will certainly have their sights on 3,625 level of significant support, the weekly chart which was in a confirmed a sell-signal has turned to neutral! Please note the longer-term charts are overbought   Transports Daily Chart           Transports Weekly Chart  

 

 

 

 

 

 

The SPX  was hit hard on Friday as Dubai's debt crisis rattled world financial markets Friday, raising concerns that some banks could further tighten lending and stall the global economic recovery....the index was weak from the get go (due to negative futures action) and it gained back almost all of last weeks loss 19.14-points gaining 18.71-points to close out the week at  1,105.98, (well off the intraweek high hit on Friday of 1119.13+/-) as I said before the index is looking very tired here and we could be very close to a 14-21% retracement cycle....markets do not move in a straight line so even though I'm expecting a 14-21% correction from the highs (a drop of 150+/- points)....I would not expect it to come with out full-filling a likely ABC corrective pattern......the SPX has been on a wild parabolic rocket ride during the second quarter as the index had surged 440+/- or  66% from the March lows.....as I show in the charts below the index appeared extremely top heavy and my propriety trading systems was flashing a multitude of negative volume divergences (this Tuesday whish is why I implemented Longs on the leveraged index SHORT-positions as I stated last week I expected that the near-term topping pattern would take us to (likely top 1,119-1,125).....I’m also seeing a multitude of increased bearish divergences between price and actual market breadth, price and volume, and price and momentum indicators that I follow for longer-term significant market moves. Please watch the weekly MACD indicators which are showing signs of topping and are now starting to curl over a very bearish signal. After this weeks whipsawing reversal we somewhat oversold near-term but on the flip-side many of the charts are also sporting potential H&S patterns so we should experience renewed selling taking us down into options X Friday 12/18/2009....on Monday if the bad-news-bears continue to smell blood  there is little real concrete support till 1070+/- (the 50Dsma = 1077.00) the the daily chart is starting to roll over from overbought conditions and we have a bearish Stochastic crossover and a MACD crossover both very negative near-term.... the weekly chart has established bearish crossovers and negative divergences....so I would be a cautious dip buyer in the zone of 1030-1040, for a near-term oversold relief rally, maybe back to 1073+/-  I warned you all last week of some renewed volatility (well I was really surprised that the VIX hardly moved on Friday, despite the massive whipsawing, an area to watch carefully), the weekly charts are still displaying multiple negative divergences and they have signaled a SELL-signal (still in effect).  I'm also seeing increased bearish divergences between price and actual market breadth, price and volume, and price and momentum indicators that I follow for longer-term significant market moves. Please watch the weekly MACD indicators which are showing signs of topping and are now starting to curl over which is often a very bearish signal, as it was during the market top of 2007.   The Weekly chart of the Wilshire 5000 is also looking like a retracement of significant size is in the works.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Nasdog was a distinct winner on Friday gaining 21.21 points or 0.98% during a moderate volume trading day where we saw distinct whipsawing back and forth after the initial gap-up due to better than expected employment data....for the week it lost 55.99-points or 2.61% the big-winner to close out the week at 2,194.35.....the NDX-100 unlike the Nasdog failed to regain last weeks losses of 28.21-points as on the week it gained 26.45-points (showing a tad bit more weakness than the Nasdog...who's strength cane from rails, airlines, and semiconductors along with a variety of speculative plays).....closing out the week at 1791.91 (well off the 1815.60 intra-week high though)......the Nasdog/NDX were the recent leaders of the relief rally off of the March lows and the main drivers of this bear-market relief rally....and now they are displaying a multitude of divergences as the light volume rallies are nice but the heavy volume sell-offs are more persistent....as I said last week the respective P/E of the lead sled-dogs in the technology environment are very stretched....priced overly to perfection in my opinion!  If the bulls return in a buying mood on Monday  they will attempt to regain the 2,205-2115 level of significant OHR on the Nasdog thereafter we have OHR now at 2,225-2235+/-...The charts are still displaying a plethora of negative divergences......If the bears return on Monday in a ravenous mood they will likely attempt to de-horn the bulls and knock the stuffing out of them as they have been bloodied significantly during the past several weeks on numerous short-squeezes...as such the bears will look to take the index back down to 2,169-2170 thereafter we have support at the 2,055+/-level.

 

As you can see from the table below the 6-horsemen as I call then in the NDX (the top 6 out of 100 stocks) account for 39% of the averages move, so this is where all the action is....these players are sporting some very large gains and if those momentum players in these names start to book profits to lock in gains the proverbial poop will hit the fan!

 

What has been moving the NDX/QQQQ              
                     
Symbol Weighting Relative highs 12/4/2009   11 Month Gain Percent Gain   Started 2007   Started 2008
AAPL 11.5 $208.71 $193.55   $123.36 144.53   $84.84   $85.35
MSFT 5.65 $30.37 $30.00   $11.06 57.28   $29.56   $19.31
QCOM 4.89 $45.90 $45.20   $10.24 28.72   $37.42   $35.66
GOOG 4.87 $594.85 $584.99   $287.20 93.35   $460.48   $307.65
CSCO 4.41 $24.80 $24.10   $8.50 52.15   $27.33   $16.30
RIMM 4.42 $88.08 $58.76   $47.50 117.05   $42.59   $40.58
INTC 3.27 $21.27 $20.47   $6.76 46.59   $19.86   $14.51
  39.10%   RIMM & AAPL the 2-largest NDX contributors in this relief rally 

 

 

 

 

 

The Russell-2000 was also a nice winner on Friday thanks in part to the huge gap up and run after a better than expected jobs numbers crossed....it gained 14.01-points and closed out the week at 602.79 this index needs to be watched very closely as the negative divergences were growing and expanding and this weeks relief rally up to 607+/- is what I thought would be an oversold bounce) it had up to this week been showing some serious signs of internal weakness as I have written about for several weeks now and these divergences are weighing heavily on the small/mid-cap players the speculative playground of mutual fund managers!  The index gained 25.58-points on the week....and now is starting to show signs of rebounding an index we need to watch carefully for direction tonality as goes the the Russell-200 goes the markets I have found repeatedly as this is the stomping ground of fund-managers (since the high posted on 10-19-2009....624.13 this once "leader of the pack" has been a laggard....this index is also historically the speculative playground for the high beta-players and growth speculators and like the Nasdog it had been a stellar winner during the past 8-9+/- months relief rally. The index is still over-sold on a near-term basis....and now that it has broken above the 50Dsma its looking quite bullish right now....and we could head back to retest the relative highs.

If the bulls return in a buying mood on Monday look for them to assault the 613 - 615 level thereafter 625+/-....if the bad-news bears return in a nasty selling mood on Monday they could take this index down to 588-590 thereafter we have support at 575+/-) from the March lows to the October highs) after that we have support 544-545 level.  The weekly charts are displayed bearish-divergence patterns. This is the fourth quarter and small caps are supposed to be out performing. I have written this a dozen times in the past several weeks but it is still true. This under performance is suggesting that fund managers are still very skittish of the market. This is  bearish signal. However if the tonality reverses we could see a nice end-of-the-year rally!  However since the greenback is starting to reverse...if it continues commodity stocks (energy, metals, agri) the index could roll over as well and weaken, especially if the dollar carry trade starts to unwind!

 

 

 

Dollar, our precious greenback

The U.S. dollar has been enjoying a tiny respite from its declining trend over the past two months, as evident on the dollar index chart.   As it bounced from the 74.24 level.  We are forming what I believe to be a perfect falling wedge pattern pattern, which is a TYPICAL reversal pattern...Only time will tell

The dollar index has near-term solid support at 73.50-74.00 and now since we saw a little fight to the Dollar on Friday it needs to rally back up to and breech the OHR at 77.00 and then I will call this rebound as a near-term bull-market in the greenback....and look for a run to 82.00+/- ....which could be a distinct sign of further weakness for commodities and energy stocks and precious metals, and some small benefits  for Americans)…and if this happens look for commodities to continue their near term drop-off.  As I said last week I have seen similar consolidation patterns on the EUR/USD and the AUD/USD, and both appeared to be ready for a near-term  to be readying for a breakout to the upside. However if we see additional geopolitical instability, the dollar strength could surge hard and a break out of the dollar index above 80.00 would indicate a near-term trend change, and generate a massive short squeeze in the greenback!.

Note; When I generally think about the government’s exploding debt levels, I don’t generally focus on interest payments….but I took a few minutes and did just that this weekend and its staggering. Those payments will likely total $4.8 trillion over the next 10 years (payments we are leaving future generations). Right now thanks to the easy money policies at the Fed interest rates are near zero, thanks to the Federal Reserve’s massive monetary stimulus; but at some point the Fed will have to reverse this easing and wow what a problem out debt will face. When interest rates rise, even a small amount, the interest payments go up a lot because of the size of the massive humungous debt-level. We’re in hock as a nation like never before. Neither the administration nor Congress has any plan to change that and we will likely lose our leadership status as a result of it; and both the actual and hidden costs of our debt are rising every day.

.

Economic Releases for the Week of   12/07/2009

Date

ET

Release

For

Consensus

Prior

December  07 14:00 Consumer Credit October $9.3B $14.8B
December  09 10:00 Wholesale Inventories October 0.5% 0.9%
December  09 10:30 Crude Inventories 12/04 NA 2.09M
December  10 08:30 Initial Claims 12/05 465K 457K
December  10 08:30 Continuing Claims 12/04 5435K 5465K
December  10 08:30 Trade Balance October $37.0B $36.5B
December  10 14:00 Treasury Budget November $134.1B $176.4B
December  11 08:30 Export Prices ex-agriculture November NA 0.3%
December  11 08:30 Import Prices ex-crude November NA 0.4%
December  11 08:30 Retail Sales November 0.7% 1.4%
December  11 08:30 Retail Sales ex-auto November 0.4% 0.2%
December  11 09:55 Michigan  Sentiment-Preliminary numbers December 68.5 67.4
December  11 10:00 Business Inventories October 0.3% 0.4%
 
 

Corporate profits

Profits at U.S. firms rose in the third quarter by the most in five years, but it wasn’t as broad based as those hypsters on the various financial bubblevision networks would have us believe as earnings at banks made up the largest part of the gain.  

Corporate profits rose 11% from the prior three months to $1.36 trillion, the biggest gain since the first quarter of 2004, according to the pro forma reporting Commerce Department. Domestically, earnings at financial institutions jumped a whopping $97 billion, or 36%, while those at other firms rose by $12.9 billion, or 2.0% (this is the result of massive taxpayer liquidity infusions and the easy-free Fed-head policies at our Federal Reserve which has spurred a massive dollar-carry trade and has helped the “too-big-to-fail-banks” as they have been the recipients of this taxpayer-bailout…they have also experienced massive returns through their propriety trading desks which I believe have benefited through insider trading activities! Firms from Goldman Sachs to Morgan Stanley boosted their earnings results last quarter through trading fixed income and outright in the commodities and the markets as they benefited nicely from the orchestrated bear-market relief rally. 

10-15-2009 Goldman Sachs reported a surge in third-quarter profit driven by trading and investments (is this repeatable) with the firm’s own money (shareholder money). Third-quarter net income more than tripled to $3.19 billion, or $5.25 a share, in the three months ended 9-25-09, from $845 million, or $1.81 a share, in past year’s third quarter, the. Revenue compared with the second quarter dropped in every division except principal investing and asset management, and earnings declined 7.2% from the second quarter’s record $3.44 billion. “Our second quarter was a record in virtually every single business,” CFO David Viniar said on the conference call. The third quarter was the firm’s third-best in equities as well as fixed income, commodities and currencies, he said.

Third-quarter revenue at Goldman Sachs doubled to $12.4 billion from $6.04 billion last year. Value-at-risk, a measure of how much the firm estimates it could lose in a single day of trading, fell to $238 million from a record $245 million in the second quarter. Revenue from fixed-income, currency and commodity trading, or FICC, surged to $5.99 billion from $1.60 billion in last year’s third quarter. Equities revenue rose to $2.78 billion from $1.56 billion.

Compensation, the company’s biggest single expense, accounted for 43% of revenue (huge claw-back from shareholders) to total $5.35 billion in the third quarter. So far this year, Goldman Sachs has set aside $16.7 billion to pay employees, compared with just $11.4 billion after the first three quarters of last year…and the yearly total is yet to be announced….insiders are getting rich off of the utilization of taxpayer and shareholder monies!  

Goldman Sachs has also benefited from massive Federal Reserve support, government backing on about $31 billion of debt, and was one of the largest recipients of funds from the bailout of AIG where they were paid $1.00 on every dollar at risk.  

Other firms have prospered greatly by cutting costs (the Chain-Saw Al Dunlop mentality, indicating they will not be quick at all to add too payrolls as it would negatively impact their bottom lines. The weakness in the non-financials tells us just how limited this so called stellar recovery is at this point. Businesses are going to be very cautious in increasing the cost side of the equation, and most often the biggest part of the cost side is labor; so I seriously doubt that they are going to rush out and start to hire ant time soon. Many firms are already exploring additional labor cost cutting measures (out sourcing). 

These profit figures, included in the Commerce Department’s second estimated report on GDP for the third quarter were the first look at total earnings. The data showed the world’s largest economy grew at a 2.8% annual pace from July through September, less than the government estimated last month (3.5%), as consumer spending trailed forecasts significantly (consumers account for 70% of GDP). 

In the first three quarters of 2009, profits at financial institutions soared 198%, the biggest nine-month gain since records began in 1948; (note: earnings were down 65% in the nine months ended in December 2008, the biggest such decrease on record. The financials were a train wreck and in my opinion the firms were coming off such a low basis that it’s easy to see a huge headline increase. The jump in profits is definitely not evenly close to being distributed evenly among banks, making it very less likely that the money will find its way back into the economy in the form of loans (Goldman will pay out $0.45+/- for every dollar in profit in bonuses to their insiders).   

 

Are the markets over-valued....or just stretched and they will fill out their earnings

I always find it amazing that more investors are willing to buy stocks at Dow 10,000 than they were at Dow 6,600 after a 60% rally, shouldn’t investors start to be concerned about valuations…I am to some extent especially in the high-beta high P/E trading stocks that are the hyped favorites of the propriety trading desks.  

It seems right now that many an investor has their head buried in the sand like an ostridge as they are hoping and praying that the greater fool theory hold true to form.

The greater fool theory (sometimes I like to call it the idiot fool theory) is the premise and belief held by an investor or trader who makes a questionable investment/trade, that they will get bailed out with a profit as the assumption is that they will be able to sell it later to “a bigger fool/bagholder” in other words they historically buy equities or an asset not because they believe that it is worth the price, but rather because they believe that they will be able to sell it to someone else at a higher price! 

Now I’m going to talk about asset valuations which is the ability to grasp what’s not evident or obvious to the average investor that is caught up in the hype of the momentum of the markets. This implies that discerning investors will have to look beyond the general train of thought being promoted on the various bubblevision networks by those talking up their books (and looking for the next-herd of bagholders), in order to attain a balanced and educated opinion as to real valuations of assets and equities! 

Right now we have seen that the major U.S. benchmarks (SPX, Dow, Nasdog) have rallied 60% and some a tad more since their respective March lows (the often hyped bear-market bottom). And as such it’s logical to infer that these stocks are more expensive today than they were eight months ago. 

Ironically, more investors are now willing, strange as it may be, too buy equities with the Dow trading above 10,000 than they were at Dow 6,500; and worse yet the same economists and analysts who didn’t see the bear-market evolving or anticipate the so called March market bottom or the 2007 market top, are now telling the herd (investing public) that the recession is over and the storm has passed and all is right with the world again. Even though this irony should be very obvious, it’s hardly publicized or acknowledged, as to do so would be bad for Wall Street, and good for average investors to be reminded of these facts…it I this type of short-term memory loss that Wall-Street prays for and that makes the average Wall Street firm a proverbial trend chasing machine. 

However bucking the trend has proved to be a very profitable strategy for myself and for my subscribers for many years now as I was calling for a bottom when the Dow was trading at 6,600 and the SPX at 680 when the majority of fund managers and many on Wall Street were in hyper panic mode, as I was preparing my subscribers for what I believed to be a massive short-covering bear market relief rally (though I must be truthful, the rally has run more than I thought was possible).

As I have always said there are times to follow a trend and then there are times to reverse against it; but I must note that getting caught on the wrong side of a trend can prove a costly if you do not utilize good money management.  

I have always looked to valuation metrics as one way to discern the longer-term trend for the markets. And as such we must understand when a P/E ratio does not equal a real P/E ratio. As you can recollect from accounting 101 P/E is simply a measurement of a firm’s profitability when compared to its stock price, and as such the price to earnings (P/E) ratio is one of the easiest and most accepted valuation matrixes utilized by value investors!  

What is not commonly known though (as Wall-Street spends a lot of money masking the true numbers), is that there are different ways to calculate P/E ratios; and unfortunately for the average uninformed investor not all roads lead to the same P/E ratio result.  In fact, the various computations are like an analogy to an object’s length expressed in centimeters, millimeters or inches, as such P/E ratios of the same index or firm will vary depending on the methodology used as the basic foundation for the once thought of basic calculation.  

To explore the various approaches that bubblevision, Wall-Street analysts and real value investors utilize is a bit technical. The P/E ratio is attained by the interaction between two basic variables, price and earnings.  

The “Price” part of the equation is always obvious (its where the stock is trading) and easily determined by a looking at various end-of-day price services. Unfortunately the second part of the equations called “Earnings” is wrought with fuzzy math calculations and pro forma data as there are different methods to calculate earnings. So you can see that the final P/E ratio depends on which two of the following four components are used as a foundation for the earnings component:

  • Operating earnings

  • Reported earnings

  • Top down analysis, mostly a consensus from analysts that are historically wrong

  • Bottom up analysis, mostly a consensus from analysts that are historically wrong

o    Operating earnings: include income from the sale of goods and services. Not included in this calculation of costs are expenses related to marketing, layoffs, financing, M&A and other so called miscellaneous numbers. Operating earnings almost always tend to be higher as corporations massage them and “omit” expenses that have to be included for real reported earnings. Higher or inflated earnings result in artificially lowered P/E ratio…making their firms look more attractive to value investors!

o    Reported earnings are based on generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) [Wall-Street hates GAAP accounting], which provides a “cookie-cutter” type earnings report that allows for an apples to apples comparison between firms and does not allow firms to omit unfavorable factors when making earnings determinations.

o    Bottom up estimates are based on the individual earnings from each firm. The estimates are put together from the consensus returns published by individual stock analysts covering the various firms (many with self serving relationships). Adding up individual earnings numbers, yields earnings for indexes or sectors.

o    Top down is an estimate of earnings based on the broad economic indicators many of whish are vastly overstated and over-estimated such as GPD growth, inflation, interest rates, etc. We see that the various economists’ forecasts are reduced down to sectors or markets. As such historically top down forecasts tend to result in vastly lower P/E ratios. 

P/E ratios based on top down operating earnings tend to be at the lower end of the spectrum, while P/E ratios based on bottom up reported earnings tend to be on the higher end. Additionally, the P/E ratio can be based on projected earnings. A P/E ratio based on projected 2010 earnings would be lower than a P/E ratio based on actual 2009 earnings, since earnings are almost always expected to increase as the majority of analysts get their numbers from the firms they cover, and it’s in their best interest to project earnings increases. 

Its interesting to note that the numbers currently listed on Standard and Poor’s website for top down operating earnings P/E ratio is 27.78 (the highest reading since 2002) and it gets better as the number comes in at 85.55 for top down when looking at reported earnings (the highest ever recorded).  

And these folks are living on  cloud nine as year-to-date reported earnings for the SPX came in at $36.09; and right now top down estimates for 2010 are north of $81.00 so as mentioned above, top down earnings are distilled based on broad economic data expectations such as GDP; and we have recently seen that the preliminary Q3 2009 GDP which was originally reported at 3.5%, was revised lower due to lower than expected retail sales, the trade deficit and other factors, and now the second revision to GDP was lowered to 2.8% just a few days ago. So from my vantage point in my investing career using P/E ratios based on projections is futile (a Borg term). Rather than taking a gamble using highly hyped and vastly overstated projected numbers, I have utilized in my career actual, reported data, wow a new concept for those on bubblevision and on Wall-Street. 

And now that I’ve gotten all the technical P/E crap out of the way, let’s get back to what I call the real basics of investing (buying firms that are not over-valued but undervalued). Regardless of which P/E ratio you choose to use, P/E ratios and by extension stocks are grossly overvalued. As the chart below shows, P/E ratios have reached levels never seen before. Notice the red line titled “valuation reset.”

No bear market has ever ended unless P/E ratios dropped into the lower range (green line) below the valuation level where stocks are attractive to own; and currently we have never before seen such a large spread between P/E ratios and the historic market bottom levels.