Date: 11/28/2009        Time Issued (Saturday  Afternoon   2:00 pm)

 

T-Waves Current OUT-Look  for the various Indexes/Sectors

Index  Near-Term Intermediate Term Longer-Term
DOW Neutral/Bearish

Bearish

Bearish

SPX Neutral/Bearish Bearish Bearish
Nasdog Neutral/Bearish

Bearish

Bearish

Russell-2000 Neutral/Bearish

Bearish

Bearish

I’m still seeing smart money selling into strength time and time again; a clear indication of distribution. As such please take on LONG positions very carefully at these levels as the risk to being long at these levels is compounding every day especially in over-bought technology and consumer-cyclicals and retailers  Strap-yourselves, as it is sure to be another wild another wild rollercoaster ride!! The question is do you want a ticket to partake of this amusement ride     I believe we are close to another major inflection period for the markets, so please trade cautiously and be quick to protect profits. Please remember folks there are usually 7-8 bullish (participants) to every 2+/- bearish traders/investors, so the propensity for bullishness is almost always stronger, as no one wants to be a party pooper, especially those funds that are playing with other people’s money as they attempt to pad their books into their fiscal-year end! However the reason that the market usually drops 4-5 times faster then it goes up is liquidity, when selling picks up is a contagion and the lack of buyers due to fear, can feed on itself very quickly like a plague or a quick acting cancer, as such markets plunge (normally) quicker than they go up!   

I'm turning very bearish right now (see my technical section below)....and I will utilize any bullishness on Monday to establish some longer term (2-4 month, Short positions *or Puts* as we would need to breech the relative near-tern highs for me to change my bias outlook....as such I'm looking to establish call positions and outright positions in the inverse leveraged funds....see a partial list below (we could also use a put-write strategy as well (example of a put-write play, we could write/sell the January 2010 SDS  $36 strike puts for $1.92 taking in $192.00 per contract, if they are pus to us at $36.00 we have a built in protective stop-loss of $1.92)....I'm also looking to SHORT a host of high-beta high P/E stocks as well (like  AAPL, AMZN, PCLN)   In a nut shell I'm looking for the resurgence of a very significant correction to take the bulls by the bulls in the days/weeks ahead and slap the bulls about...as the greenback is more oversold than at any time in history, way to many folks all leaning to the Short-side of the dollar market!!     See my in depth analysis below of various market conditions!

 

These instruments provide some extra-leverage when trading the various sectors  You could also look at utilizing the SHORT  2x-leveraged Pro-Shares                                                         ProShares-Website

  • FXP     (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the China-25 Index

  • RXD    (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the Dow Health Care Index

  • QID     (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the NASDAQ-100 Index

  • SDS     (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the S&P 500 Index

  • MZZ   (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the S&P Mid-Cap 400 Index

  • DXD    (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the Dow Jones Industrial Average

  • TWM  (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the Russell-2000

  • SKK    (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the Russell-2000 Growth

  • SSG     (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the Semiconductors

  • REW   (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the Ultra technology

  • SKF     (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a SHORT the Ultra Financial

Emerging Markets BEAR 3x EDZ, Financial BEAR 3x FAZ, Energy BEAR 3x ERY, Developed Markets BEAR 3x DPK, Technology BEAR 3x TYP, Large Cap BEAR 3x BGZ, Small Cap BEAR 3x TZA, Mid Cap BEAR 3x MWN    Direxion link

For reference only LONG-2x-leveraged Pro-Shares

  • QLD    (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a Long the NASDAQ-100 Index

  • SSO     (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a Long the S&P 500 Index

  • MVV   (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a Long the S&P Mid-Cap 400 Index

  • DDM   (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a Long the Dow Jones Industrial Average

  • UWM  (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a Long the Russell-2000

  • UKK    (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a Long the Russell-2000 Growth

  • USD     (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a Long the Semiconductors

  • ROM   (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a Long the Ultra technology

  • UYG     (attempts to replicate the {2x} of a Long the Ultra Financial

Emerging Markets Bull 3x EDC, Financial Bull 3x FAS, Energy Bull 3x ERX, Developed Markets Bull 3x DZK, Technology Bull 3x TYH, Large Cap Bull 3x BGU, Small Cap Bull 3x TNA,  Mid Cap Bull 3x MWJ

I had expected a shortened trading session of subdued proportions following the Thanksgiving holiday, but sellers moved briskly into position as they pressure stocks downward (especially the high-beta high P/E speculative names) amid news of credit troubles in Dubai. Their actions gave the stock market its worst single-session percentage drop of the month and caused volatility (VIX, VXN) to spike. Basically it was news that the Dubai government took charge of restructuring their corporate flagship, Dubai World, and asked creditors to defer payments of some $20 billion of debt due in the next 18 months that provided a profit taking catalyst. We saw that the selling pressure ebbed prior to the opening bell, stocks still started the session sharply lower...and this weakness reflected thru the European major indices that were trading during Thursday's (our holiday). I believe it was just a reminder to those who participated in the rally off of the March lows a reason to lock in gains from the market's 8+/- month rally. Amid the pressure, many global participants looked to establish positions in what is perceived as quality; so initially it favored the U.S. dollar (long-trade), which exacerbated weakness among stocks early on. However the greenback gave up more than half of its early gains to settle out the secession with a mere gain of just 0.3%.....the greenback's initial advance also pressured commodities, which had already been suffering from global selling pressure.

So as stocks sold off significantly on Friday as U.S. investors reacted to the global sell-off triggered by a debt crisis in Dubai, we saw that crude traded near a six-week low, gold dropped and the dollar soared as worried investors fled riskier assets and moved into safer havens. The stock market's sell-off began in Europe and continued in Asia on Friday after Dubai said they would delay debt repayments from its investment company, Dubai World. The decision raised broader questions about the safety of emerging-market debt and the strength of the global recovery.

A wave of selling swept across Asian markets and into our markets on Friday (a shortened post-holiday trading day called black-Friday for retailers), investors scrambled to piece together how much exposure regional lenders especially those in the Euro-land have to the financial troubles in Dubai.

Selling pressure accelerated in the afternoon session as future’s markets indicated a sharply lower opening. Investors were also spooked by broader fears that global financial markets have not healed properly since last year's crisis, and that the Dubai problem could expose these weaknesses in the overall markets. Dubai had stated late Wednesday night (great-timing due to the Holiday-trading environment) that they would seek a delay in debt repayments owed by Dubai World, a state-run conglomerate with about $60 billion in liabilities. The conglomerate has interests in real estate, ports and the leisure industry. Dubai said it would restructure Dubai World and announced a 6-month “standstill” on repayments of the state-run wide-ranging conglomerate's debt. Dubai's woes were a blow to market sentiment, serving as a reminder that potential trouble spots remain in the world economy and things are not what they always are hyped to be.

I don't see this as a massive contagion just yet but it's another warning for risk-hedged investors (remember these loose monetary conditions [and] loose lending have contributed to various asset bubblers). And, we still have various contagions out there [many even of a greater magnitude] and we could continue to see these kinds of nasty surprises.

Boy-o-Boy we will surely have a horde of economic data and geopolitical/financial news to move the markets this week as the credit-debacle in Dubai, the non-farm payrolls data, Black Friday/Cyber Monday and the manufacturing/service ISM reports will be released along with the Fed tan-book this coming week, and if that wasn’t bad enough we will have another clown show on capital hill where Congress will have the chance to throw poison darts at Fed chief B-52 Bernanke.

So from my vantage point the path of least resistance for our equity market is that of profit taking as the path is fraught with land mines (bouncing Betties) this week, and investors and fund managers with a host of pent up profits will surely want to bookem then gat cut off at the knees and risk losing their bonuses.

If Dubai's debt woes intensify and spread to other emerging markets it will quickly prompt a very quick withdrawal from riskier assets, and Friday's sell-off will likely carry through into this week until we reach some equilibrium.

Investors/traders will also have to speculate and contend with any so called surprises from a Senate Banking Committee hearing on the re- nomination of B-52 Ben Bernanke's to a second term (I think he should be fired (and jailed for theft of the American way of life). This hearing could provide some very ill tasting fodder for Wall Street at a time when the Fed is facing deep scrutiny in Congress for their massive bailout of large financial institutions (those deemed by them as to big to fail, the very same firms who’s deceitful and contemptuous actions caused the credit-debacle) during the credit crisis.

I’m sure that many a congressman will ask about the Fed’s latest banter where they stated that it could be 5-6 years before we return to normal growth. That’s according to Fed officials in the central bank’s latest economic forecast. They expect unemployment, now 10.2%, to remain in a range of 6.8 to 7.5% through 2012 (wishful thinking as I expect it to be in the range of 10.5-12.00%). “Business contacts reported that they would be cautious in their hiring and would continue to aggressively seek cost savings,” Fed officials said in their minutes.

Businesses would be able to meet any increases in demand in the near term by raising their employee’s currently depressed hours thus delaying the need to add to their payrolls. It sure doesn't look like the beginning of a normal, rapid recovery to this old economist. We’re in a form of mini-depression from my vantage point which typically happens after a prolonged period of nasty unchecked credit excesses that result in a bubble bursting and we get asset deflation. We have seen asset deflation, and we had a contraction in private-sector credit.

They also may ask about….the explosion in the Fed’s balance sheet as the Federal Reserve's balance sheet hit a new all time record of $2.23 Trillion in assets, after an $11 billion spike in MBS and Agency purchases this week over last week.  Securities held outright: $1,785 billion (an increase of $92 billion month/month, resulting from $2 billion in new Treasury purchases, which have tapered off at $776.5 billion, $79 billion increase in MBS and $12 billion in Agency Debt), or a $11 billion increase sequentially.  Net borrowings: $218 billion.

Friday's employment report for November will be the market moving event with job losses expected to decrease significantly from October (hell they ignore the household survey and only focus on the establishment survey so the headline pro forma numbers could beat expectations as the street is expecting a drop of only 125,000 jobs from last months 190,000 reading and the whisper number is at 105,000….I feel this is going to be a huge disappointment for the markets).

Investors will also get an early view of how retailers fared during Black Friday, as releases trickle in on Monday. Both the job market and consumer spending remain among the weakest links in the economic chain and could potentially stymie this so called burgeoning recovery.

Remember when in doubt CASH is always King/Queen. I believe we are closing in on another MAJOR -MAJOR significant inflection period for the markets (11-06-11-13), so please trade cautiously and be quick to protect profits, as they are only a good thing when you place them into your account..  We have a horde of economic data squeezed into this week, so there should be plenty of great trading opportunities! (see economic calendar below).....  If you are LONG please trade cautiously as I believe the large trading desks can smell blood in the water and the sharks are starting to circle.....The markets at least at first blush last week were ignoring dismal economic news. Primarily because bad economics news means the Fed is going to stay on the sidelines for a long time and allow the lecherous banks to borrow at near zero, and run up commodities to act as a tax on Americans/others as well.

 

How is this bullish?      Some experts like Cramer and Kudlow have repeatedly stated that the housing market has already bottomed (back in May), but one statistic indicates otherwise and defies their so called logic. The portion of U.S. homeowners who are “underwater” on their home loans (that is, they owe more on the mortgage than the home is worth) surged to a whopping 24.5% in the third quarter, or almost 10.8 million households, according to First American CoreLogic, a real estate research firm. Many of the underwater homes will ultimately end up in foreclosure.  Of the 10.8 million homes underwater, nearly half have a mortgage that is at least 20% higher than the home’s value (a huge negative contagion as this amounts to almost 6-million homes), according to the data compiled by First American CoreLogic. More than 520,000 of these homeowners are already in default on their mortgages. This is a huge over-hang of risk in the mortgage markets that no one is talking about or addressing.  Some homeowners who are underwater are fully capable of paying their mortgages, but they are in the elite group or top-wage earners that are ditching their homes anyway to the tune of 590,000.

.

Truck tonnage for September reflected in my opinion just how tepid and lackluster this so called recovery in the real economy is according to the ATA reports: The American Trucking Associations’ advance seasonally adjusted (SA) For-Hire Truck Tonnage Index decreased 0.2% in October, following a 0.3% contraction in September. The latest decline lowered the SA index to 103.6 (2000=100) from the revised 103.8 in September. The non-seasonally adjusted index, which represents the change in tonnage actually hauled by the fleets before any seasonal adjustment, equaled 109.6 in October, up 1.6 percent from September.  Compared with October 2008, SA tonnage dropped 5.2%, which was the best year-over-year showing since November 2008. In September, the index was down 7.3% from a year earlier. The economy is behaving with starts and stops. This is being reflected in truck tonnage, as well as most economic indicators. The industry should remain prepared for ups and downs in the months ahead, but the general trend should be modest improvement. Since consumer spending and manufacturing are not surging, trucking shouldn’t expect robust growth either. However, both retail sales and manufacturing output are exhibiting mild upward trend lines.


For investors, the past decade has been like watching pain dry as their investments are mostly underwater…but wall-street is cheering this 60-65% rally off the March bottom like it’s a monasteries bull-market!  They have been drinking spiked punch way too long…and right now most do not care as long as it looks like there might be a little punch left in the bowl for them to drink as well. The risk trades are again running rampant and the propriety trading desks are trying their best to suck in another herd-of bagholders, who have short-term memory losses!

Astute investors should read the FDIC’s Quarterly Banking Profile (see it below) and watch the departure of the chief financial officer of at least 1-3 major banking institution early next year, which will likely trigger a cascading negative affect over the financial sector….as we could see an all hell could break loose scenario. The number of banks on the FDIC's "problem list" rose 33% during the third quarter to 552, the highest level since 1993.

I still do not believe that the subprime mortgage crisis has passed and been dealt with (we have masked the problem with financial trickery and fuzzy math accounting.   The U.S. economy currently faces a very nasty coupling of significant weaker employment conditions with a mountain of resets on adjustable rate mortgages looming on the horizon. These loans, written at the height of the housing bubble, and they undoubtedly carry the highest loan-to-value ratios.

The assumption that the credit crisis is behind us is completely out of line with reality (from my vantage point, and all the intervention has yet to deal with the core issues)….the inevitability of profound credit losses here is still monstrous and unnervingly similar to the inevitability of profound losses following the dot-com bubble but on a magnitude of 10!

According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, nearly one in 10 homeowners with mortgages were at least one payment behind in the third quarter, up from about one in 14 mortgage holders in the third quarter of 2008. This number is the highest since the association began keeping records in 1972.


While the US recently reported 3.5% subsequently revised down to 2.8% growth in the third quarter, the talking butt-heads on the various bubblevision networks suggested that the most severe recession since the Great Depression is well over, and that the recovery is well underway (we’re in a new-bull-market according to the hypsters!

However as I have written about repeatedly that our economy is actually much weaker than the so called official pro forma data suggests. In fact, official measures of GDP may grossly overstate growth in the economy, as it really doesn’t reflect the fact that business sentiment especially among small firms is downright abysmal and their output has been steadily falling off a proverbial cliff. And if the GDP data was properly corrected for this segment, third-quarter GDP may have been closer to 1.25% rather than 2.8%.

The story of the U.S. is, indeed like that of the “tale of two cities” {It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us,……the period was so far like the present period,} well again the similarities are stark as we basically have two distinct economies. There is a less significant one that is slowly recovering (where wall-street and the financial sector flourishes) and a larger one that is still in a deep and persistent downturn (where most Americans reside).

Consider the following facts. While America's official unemployment rate is already 10.2%, the figure jumps to a whopping 17.5% when discouraged workers and partially employed workers are included. And, while the hyped data from firms suggest that job losses in the past 3-months were about 620,000 (the head-line establishment numbers) the household surveys point to a far different dismal number as it includes those folks self-employed (landscapers, real estate brokers and general labors) and small entrepreneurs (small business folks like me) as this number for the past 3-months comes in very hot at over two million people unemployed; but of course those on the various bubblevision networks do not cite this data as they are for the most part, part of the Wall-Street spin machine.

In October, the number of unemployed persons increased by 558,000 to 15.7 million. The overall unemployment rate rose by 0.4 percentage point to 10.2 percent, the highest rate since April 1983. Since the start of the recession in December 2007, the number of unemployed persons has risen by 8.2 million, and the unemployment rate has grown by 5.3 percentage points.

Moreover, the total effect on real income (the product of jobs times hours worked times average hourly wages) has been more severe than that implied by the job losses alone, because many firms (are taking the Chainsaw Al Dunlop approach to managing earnings and expenses) and they are cutting their worker’s hours, placing them on furlough or outright reducing their wages (especially benefits) as a way to push off costs and meet their earnings expectations.

Worse yet most if not all of the lost jobs (especially the good paying and benefited jobs) (in construction, finance, manufacturing and real tangible services are likely gone forever), and recent studies suggest that a 25-30% of U.S. jobs will be fully outsourced over time to other lower wage countries. Thus, a growing proportion of the work force (those Americans that were big discretionary spenders) are losing real hope of finding gainful decent employment, while the unemployment rate (especially for poor and unskilled workers, and those about the enter the work force {our children} will remain significantly high for a much longer period of time than in previous recessions…and this contagion will act like a cancer eating away at our economy in my opinion!

Consider also the still contracting credit markets (the life blood of growth) and even prime borrowers with good credit scores and investment-grade firms are experiencing deteriorating credit conditions, as the former use to have unfettered access to mortgages and consumer credit while the latter had access to bond and equity markets.

But non-prime borrowers (about 33% of U.S. households, now do not have nearly as much access to mortgages and credit card credit as they use to, (and many are tapped out). Far to many Americans are living from paycheck to paycheck, and its becoming a difficult endeavor for they to meet their obligations as real wages are deteriorating, owing to the decline in hourly wages and hours worked as seen in the labor department’s reports.

We must also reflect upon what is happening to private consumption and real-retail sales. Recent monthly figures suggest a rise in retail sales. But, because the official statistics capture mostly sales by larger retailers and exclude the fall by hundreds of thousands of smaller mom and pop stores and businesses that have failed or are failing and the pro forma look at consumption looks better than it really is. And, while higher-income and wealthier households have a buffer of savings to smooth out their consumption and avoid having to increase savings, most lower-income households must save more, as banks and other lenders cut back on home-equity loans and lower limits on available credit cards. It’s estimated that close to 40% of American households are just 3-paychecks away from bankruptcy, a dismal contagion!


Is this really a bullish development……One of the keys to the housing market turn-around is the success of the plethora of so called modification programs. The Treasury Department is expected to release a key measurement the success or failure of such programs next month and the overall number of permanent modifications for the Making Home Affordable program (another taxpayer-bailout). From the data I have reviewed I have seen that very few mortgages have been permanently modified so I can’t wait to see how the Treasury pro forma report turns out! Lenders have temporarily restructured on the surface hundreds of thousands of loans, but long-term changes have proved elusive (they have stretched out payments and back loaded principle etc.) as such this data is also raising the specter of a new wave of foreclosures (those that are not yet disclosed on balance statements).

The Treasury Department announced in October that, after a slow start last spring, its Making Home Affordable loan-modification initiative had resulted in about 500,000 trial modifications. The department said the $75-billion centerpiece of its anti-foreclosure efforts was on track to meet its goal of offering at least 5-years of lower payments to as many as 4 million stressed-out borrowers.  But even after reporting this month that trial modifications had topped 650,000, the government still hasn't said how many of those loans have been permanently restructured (a very miniscule number at best in my opinion). The Treasury Department stated that such numbers will be in next month's report on the program, which has been allocated $75 billion from the government's $700-billion Troubled Asset Relief Program taxpayer bailout fund. At this point, converting 40% of the trial modifications into long-term restructurings would be considered a major accomplishment. As of 9-01-2009 with more than 350,000 trial modifications begun, the program has only achieved a mere 1,711 permanent modifications (that’s right less than 2000).

Exactly what is holding up these so called conversions depends on whom you talk to…but the bottom line is that Wall-Street and the mega banks win again and main-street (average Americans) lose again; but we can not ignore the looming contagions due to non-modifications and likely subsequent foreclosures that will continue to escalate.

We also saw this week that Bankruptcy cases filed in federal courts for fiscal year 2009 totaled 1,402,816, up 34.5% over the 1,042,993 filings reported for the 12-month period ending September 30, 2008, according to statistics released today by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. The federal Judiciary’s fiscal year is the 12-month period ending September 30,2009. The bankruptcies reported today are for October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009. For the 12-month period ending September 30, 2009, business filings totaled 58,721, up 52 percent from the 38,651 business filings in the 12-month period ending September 30, 2008. Non-business filings totaled 1,344,095, up 34% from the 1,004,342 non-business bankruptcy filings in September 2008.

This is hardly bullish for housing or our economy…..I read an interesting Washington Post article on Thursday… Fannie Mae to tighten lending standards….Banks will demand higher credit scores, lower borrower debt….. Starting 12-12-2009, the automated system that Fannie Mae uses to approve loans will reject borrowers who have at least a 20% down payment but whose credit scores fall below 620 out of 850, previously, the cut-off was 580….also, for borrowers with a 20% down payment, no more than 45% of their gross monthly income can go toward paying debts (this will surely knock off many an applicant). Loans to people with credit scores below 620 have fallen seriously delinquent at a rate approximately 9-times higher than other loans purchased in the same period.

Fannie Mae, the giant mortgage finance company that helps shape lending guidelines, plans next month to raise minimum credit score requirements and limit the amount of overall debt that borrowers can carry relative to their incomes. The changes are the latest in a series of crackdowns by the mortgage industry and could surprise some prospective home buyers. The industry is starting to roll back loose lending standards that led to the mortgage meltdown and the subsequent economic crisis. But the fear is that if the industry becomes too restrictive, it will freeze out too many borrowers and impede an economic recovery.


Billionaire George Soros stated this week that he believes a “bloodletting” may be in the offing for leveraged buyout firms (LBOs) and commercial real estate investors amid the worst economy in seven decades. “In commercial real estate and leveraged buyouts, the bloodletting is yet to come,” Soros said. “These factors will continue to weigh on the American economy, and the American consumer will no longer be able to serve as the motor for the world economy.” Bankers across the globe have accounted for $1.66 trillion of write downs and write-offs on bad loans since the start of the credit crisis in 2007.  Moody’s Investors Service reports that the global speculative default rate will peak at 12.5% (I believe it peaks at 17.75%) this quarter as the U.S. and European economies continue to struggle. The rate rose to 12% in the third quarter, up from 2.8% just a year ago, Moody’s reports….that’s nearly a 10% in just a mere 12 months, and I do not see it abating soon. And as such given these facts, the so called global economic recovery is very likely to run out of steam very soon and that a “double-dip” recession may emerge early in 2011. The incessant double-digit unemployment rate is going to erode confidence like a cancer, and not just in the financial industry.


A contagion no one wants to speak about….. Banks’ main worries have centered on the toxic assets on their balance sheets during the past several years (other people’s debt that was given out with reckless abandon by bankers and financiers). Now they have to worry about their own debt, and it’s a massive contagion. About $10 trillion (yes trillion) of bank debt comes due by the end of 2015 (just 6-years from now), including a whopping $7 trillion due by 2012, according to Moody's Investors Service.

Most banks will have to refinance that debt at much higher interest rates (unless the B-52 Bernanke and the Treasury dude Geithner are able to artificially keep rates low) than were originally assessed on this debt. That’s because banks were able to borrow extremely cheaply during the credit bubble of 2003 to 2007 (and they better start to roll out of that debt now)…what’s important to remember is that we have seen taxpayer/government guarantees for bank debt during this financial crisis which has allowed banks to issue debt at historic low rates, but it is short-term debt which will soon become due again and again. The average maturity of new debt rated by Moody's dropped almost 60% since 2004 to a mere 3.1 years according to the reports that I have read.

Worse yet it’s not just a U.S. problem, as the average maturity for new bank debt worldwide fell almost 50% to 4.7 years during that period. “We thought that we should send a (warning) signal to the world” Jean-Francois Tremblay, a Moody's analyst, referring to a report the firm recently issued about the problem. I have been sounding this warning trumpet for many months now as despite the so called stabilization of the financial system over the past eight months (the relief rally from the march lows), banks still face tremendous internal contagions on their balance sheets.

 


 

I read an interesting account this past week that hedge funds, in the third quarter, showed their greatest appetite for stock market risk in over 2-years, according to research from Goldman Sachs. The investment bank's latest Hedge Fund Trend Monitor, which analyzed regulatory disclosures from 684 funds, found these investors had amassed $604 billion of long equity positions (this is a dangerous development as the boat is lopsided again). Estimating these same funds had $363 billion in short positions, net long exposure rose to 41%. This marks the highest, most bullish levels since December 2007 as funds moved to benefit from a relentless rising market. The equity markets rose 17% during the quarter, suggesting that hedge fund net exposure increased as a result of active equity buying as well as short covering. Goldman’s analysts observed that hedge funds, though upping the ante on every sector, in particular raised their net long exposure in financials: to 29% from 9.0% percent in the second quarter and from net short positions last year.

 


 

In a glimmer of hope for the labor market, the number of U.S. workers filing new claims for jobless benefits last week fell to the lowest level since September 2008. Total claims lasting more than one week, meanwhile, also decreased. Initial claims for jobless benefits declined by 35,000 to 466,000 in the week ended 11-21-09, the Labor Department said in its weekly report. The previous week's level was revised to 501,000 from 505,000. This represents the lowest figure for claims since 9-13-2008, and it is the first time initial claims have fallen below the 500,000 mark since early January. The four-week moving average of new claims, which aims to smooth volatility in the data, also fell by 16,500 to 496,500 from the previous week's revised average of 513,000; marking the lowest level since 11-08-2008. Although we are still at historically high levels of claims, we have seen a notable decline and that is an encouraging sign according to the hypsters on bubble vision that labor market conditions are indeed improving. The pro forma trend has been very persistent since the end of August. In a supplemental Labor Department report the number of continuing claims those drawn by workers for more than one week in the week ended 11-14-2009 declined by 190,000 to 5,423,000 from the preceding week's revised level of 5,613,000.

 


 

Demand for durable goods dropped in October (a market negative), brought down by the defense sector, and we saw that the so called barometer of capital spending by businesses tumbled which is another sign in my opinion that the so called recovery is very sluggishness at best. Manufacturers' orders for durable goods decreased 0.6% to a seasonally adjusted $166.17 billion, the Commerce Department said Wednesday. Military goods demand plunged. Excluding defense, all other durables increased by 0.4% in October, after going 1.8% higher in September. Still, if not for a strange jump in commercial airline bookings, the drop in overall durables would have been much worse (I believe the airline component will take a big hit next month….. US Airways (LCC) said this week it plans to defer the delivery of 54 Airbus jets, in a bid to improve liquidity and ease its strained finances. The deferral will reduce the company's aircraft capital expenditure by about $2.5 billion over the next three years). Some manufacturers have boosted orders to slow their inventory liquidation and rebuild depleted stockpiles of goods. The data showed to some extent that manufacturers' inventories of durable goods were unchanged in October, ending a string of declines.

 


 

Spending by Americans bounced back in October (again they spent more than they took in) as their incomes rose slightly more than expected and inflation remained low (hell we never count commodity inflation food, energy etc.). Commerce Department data released on Wednesday showed spending last month rose by 0.7% compared with a September decline of 0.6%, while personal income rose by 0.2% for the second straight month. A key gauge of prices that is closely watched by the Federal Reserve to set monetary policy reiterated inflation wasn't a threat as the economy recovers slowly. The core price index for personal consumption expenditures, which excludes volatile food and energy, rose a monthly 0.2% in October and by 1.4% year-on-year. The U.S. economy's rebound was softer than originally thought in the third quarter, as we saw in the GDP revision which showed less consumer spending than initially estimated. Consumer spending, which accounts for 70-73% of U.S. economic output, increased at a 2.9% annual rate during the third quarter less than the 3.4% estimated previously. We must acknowledge however that Wednesday's reports were encouraging for potential growth in the fourth quarter, since both consumer spending and incomes rose. Personal income data for the previous months was revised up slightly. It rose by 0.2% in September and by 0.3% in August, the report showed, compared to previous estimates of a flat reading in September and a 0.1% increase the previous month. Still, with more than 10.2% of the U.S. labor force out of work, the rise in incomes remains very contained and anemic. Federal Reserve officials raised their expectations for growth this year (see their minutes) and in 2010, but predicted the recovery will be so slow that unemployment will remain very high and inflation low until the end of 2010.

 


 

New-home sales unexpectedly rose in October despite bad weather and uncertainty over a big tax credit for first-time buyers. Sales of single-family homes increased 6.2% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 430,000, according to the Commerce Department on Wednesday.  I thought the looming expiration of an $8,000 tax credit for home buyers would force these buyers to act in October. New-home sales, unlike sales of existing homes, are recorded with the signing of a sales contract and not the closing. {The tax credit has since been extended by Congress through April, a move made earlier this month that is seen helping the housing market.} Wednesday's report said sales in September dropped 2.4% to 405,000. Year over year, sales were up 5.1% since October 2008. Now for the negative slice of the pie….the median price for a new home dropped in October, but not by much, dropping 0.5% to $212,200. Inventories shrank some more. There were an estimated 239,000 homes for sale at the end of October. That represented a 6.7 months' supply at the current sales rate. An estimated 250,000 homes were for sale at the end of September, a 7.4 months' inventory.


 

Weekly Mortgage Filings dropped this past week despite Lower Refinancing costs…..we saw that applications for mortgages to buy homes rose a tad last week, but the volume of filings to refinance existing loans dropped, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association's weekly survey. Total application volume was down a seasonally adjusted 4.5% on a week-to-week basis, as refinancings dropped 9.5%. The overall pace of mortgage applications also dropped in the week ended 11/13/2009 down 2.5%. The four-week moving average for all mortgages through 11/20/2009 was up 0.5%, the MBA's latest survey showed. Refinancings made up 71.7% of all applications last week, down from 74.6% the previous week. Adjustable-rate mortgages accounted for 5.3%, up from 5.1%. The interest rate on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages averaged 4.82%, down slightly from 4.83% the previous week, while the rate on 15-year fixed-rate mortgages was unchanged at an average 4.32% rate. One-year ARMs carried a 6.66% average rate, down from 6.85% To obtain the rates, the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage required payment of an average 1.19 points, the 15-year fixed-rate mortgage required an average 1.05 points and the 1-year ARM required an average 0.33 point. A point is 1% of the mortgage amount, charged as prepaid interest.

 


We saw on Wednesday that the University of Michigan index of consumer sentiment improved from an initial reading earlier in the month of November but still dropped from the prior month, reflecting uncertain job prospects and worsening personal financial situations. Their consumer sentiment index rose to 67.4 from an early November reading of 66.00. The final survey is still 4.5% lower than October's reading of 70.6, marking the second straight monthly drop, and a substantial drop from the 73.5 reading in September. Consumers cite their deteriorating finances as well as their uncertainty about future job and income prospects more than ever before in these surveys as looming-negative-contagions, and this has turned them into very cautious spenders (as such the strength in retailers has me a tad bit perplexed). This University of Michigan sentiment index follows a stronger-than-expected rise in a consumer confidence survey released on Tuesday by the Conference Board Tuesday. The outlook for labor conditions also worsened in the Conference Board report, which tends to be less heavily weighted towards households' financial situations.For retailers who are waiting for the kick-off to the holiday shopping season, which makes its traditional launch on Friday, there was plenty of grim news in the details of the Michigan sentiment index.

 

Reuters/University of Michigan said that when respondents were asked to explain how their finances had changed, only 9%, or the smallest proportion in the sixty-year history of the survey, reported income gains (wow this flies in stark contrast to the hype on bubblevision); the largest proportion, or 38%, voluntarily cited income declines (this is a bad omen in my opinion for retailers). Unease over the labor market caused a partial reversal in buying plans, according to the University of Michigan survey. Some 39% mentioned income uncertainty as the reason they postponed purchases of large durable goods, such as furniture, appliances and home electronics. The expectations index also dropped, to 66.5 in November from 68.6 the prior month. As we are seeing negative short-term income perceptions and weak labor markets dominating household balance-sheet situations. As a result, I am firmly forecasting that real consumer spending will slow to a crawl in the fourth quarter and first quarter of 2010!

 

.

 

Are the markets over-valued....or just stretched and they will fill out their earnings

I always find it amazing that more investors are willing to buy stocks at Dow 10,000 than they were at Dow 6,600 after a 60% rally, shouldn’t investors start to be concerned about valuations…I am to some extent especially in the high-beta high P/E trading stocks that are the hyped favorites of the propriety trading desks.  

It seems right now that many an investor has their head buried in the sand like an ostridge as they are hoping and praying that the greater fool theory hold true to form.

The greater fool theory (sometimes I like to call it the idiot fool theory) is the premise and belief held by an investor or trader who makes a questionable investment/trade, that they will get bailed out with a profit as the assumption is that they will be able to sell it later to “a bigger fool/bagholder” in other words they historically buy equities or an asset not because they believe that it is worth the price, but rather because they believe that they will be able to sell it to someone else at a higher price! 

Now I’m going to talk about asset valuations which is the ability to grasp what’s not evident or obvious to the average investor that is caught up in the hype of the momentum of the markets. This implies that discerning investors will have to look beyond the general train of thought being promoted on the various bubblevision networks by those talking up their books (and looking for the next-herd of bagholders), in order to attain a balanced and educated opinion as to real valuations of assets and equities! 

Right now we have seen that the major U.S. benchmarks (SPX, Dow, Nasdog) have rallied 60% and some a tad more since their respective March lows (the often hyped bear-market bottom). And as such it’s logical to infer that these stocks are more expensive today than they were eight months ago. 

Ironically, more investors are now willing, strange as it may be, too buy equities with the Dow trading above 10,000 than they were at Dow 6,500; and worse yet the same economists and analysts who didn’t see the bear-market evolving or anticipate the so called March market bottom or the 2007 market top, are now telling the herd (investing public) that the recession is over and the storm has passed and all is right with the world again. Even though this irony should be very obvious, it’s hardly publicized or acknowledged, as to do so would be bad for Wall Street, and good for average investors to be reminded of these facts…it I this type of short-term memory loss that Wall-Street prays for and that makes the average Wall Street firm a proverbial trend chasing machine. 

However bucking the trend has proved to be a very profitable strategy for myself and for my subscribers for many years now as I was calling for a bottom when the Dow was trading at 6,600 and the SPX at 680 when the majority of fund managers and many on Wall Street were in hyper panic mode, as I was preparing my subscribers for what I believed to be a massive short-covering bear market relief rally (though I must be truthful, the rally has run more than I thought was possible).

As I have always said there are times to follow a trend and then there are times to reverse against it; but I must note that getting caught on the wrong side of a trend can prove a costly if you do not utilize good money management.  

I have always looked to valuation metrics as one way to discern the longer-term trend for the markets. And as such we must understand when a P/E ratio does not equal a real P/E ratio. As you can recollect from accounting 101 P/E is simply a measurement of a firm’s profitability when compared to its stock price, and as such the price to earnings (P/E) ratio is one of the easiest and most accepted valuation matrixes utilized by value investors!  

What is not commonly known though (as Wall-Street spends a lot of money masking the true numbers), is that there are different ways to calculate P/E ratios; and unfortunately for the average uninformed investor not all roads lead to the same P/E ratio result.  In fact, the various computations are like an analogy to an object’s length expressed in centimeters, millimeters or inches, as such P/E ratios of the same index or firm will vary depending on the methodology used as the basic foundation for the once thought of basic calculation.  

To explore the various approaches that bubblevision, Wall-Street analysts and real value investors utilize is a bit technical. The P/E ratio is attained by the interaction between two basic variables, price and earnings.  

The “Price” part of the equation is always obvious (its where the stock is trading) and easily determined by a looking at various end-of-day price services. Unfortunately the second part of the equations called “Earnings” is wrought with fuzzy math calculations and pro forma data as there are different methods to calculate earnings. So you can see that the final P/E ratio depends on which two of the following four components are used as a foundation for the earnings component:

  • Operating earnings

  • Reported earnings

  • Top down analysis, mostly a consensus from analysts that are historically wrong

  • Bottom up analysis, mostly a consensus from analysts that are historically wrong

o    Operating earnings: include income from the sale of goods and services. Not included in this calculation of costs are expenses related to marketing, layoffs, financing, M&A and other so called miscellaneous numbers. Operating earnings almost always tend to be higher as corporations massage them and “omit” expenses that have to be included for real reported earnings. Higher or inflated earnings result in artificially lowered P/E ratio…making their firms look more attractive to value investors!

o    Reported earnings are based on generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) [Wall-Street hates GAAP accounting], which provides a “cookie-cutter” type earnings report that allows for an apples to apples comparison between firms and does not allow firms to omit unfavorable factors when making earnings determinations.

o    Bottom up estimates are based on the individual earnings from each firm. The estimates are put together from the consensus returns published by individual stock analysts covering the various firms (many with self serving relationships). Adding up individual earnings numbers, yields earnings for indexes or sectors.

o    Top down is an estimate of earnings based on the broad economic indicators many of whish are vastly overstated and over-estimated such as GPD growth, inflation, interest rates, etc. We see that the various economists’ forecasts are reduced down to sectors or markets. As such historically top down forecasts tend to result in vastly lower P/E ratios. 

 

P/E ratios based on top down operating earnings tend to be at the lower end of the spectrum, while P/E ratios based on bottom up reported earnings tend to be on the higher end. Additionally, the P/E ratio can be based on projected earnings. A P/E ratio based on projected 2010 earnings would be lower than a P/E ratio based on actual 2009 earnings, since earnings are almost always expected to increase as the majority of analysts get their numbers from the firms they cover, and it’s in their best interest to project earnings increases. 

Its interesting to note that the numbers currently listed on Standard and Poor’s website for top down operating earnings P/E ratio is 27.78 (the highest reading since 2002) and it gets better as the number comes in at 85.55 for top down when looking at reported earnings (the highest ever recorded).  

And these folks are living on  cloud nine as year-to-date reported earnings for the SPX came in at $36.09; and right now top down estimates for 2010 are north of $81.00 so as mentioned above, top down earnings are distilled based on broad economic data expectations such as GDP; and we have recently seen that the preliminary Q3 2009 GDP which was originally reported at 3.5%, was revised lower due to lower than expected retail sales, the trade deficit and other factors, and now the second revision to GDP was lowered to 2.8% just a few days ago. So from my vantage point in my investing career using P/E ratios based on projections is futile (a Borg term). Rather than taking a gamble using highly hyped and vastly overstated projected numbers, I have utilized in my career actual, reported data, wow a new concept for those on bubblevision and on Wall-Street. 

And now that I’ve gotten all the technical P/E crap out of the way, let’s get back to what I call the real basics of investing (buying firms that are not over-valued but undervalued). Regardless of which P/E ratio you choose to use, P/E ratios and by extension stocks are grossly overvalued. As the chart below shows, P/E ratios have reached levels never seen before. Notice the red line titled “valuation reset.”

No bear market has ever ended unless P/E ratios dropped into the lower range (green line) below the valuation level where stocks are attractive to own; and currently we have never before seen such a large spread between P/E ratios and the historic market bottom levels.

Corporate profits

Profits at U.S. firms rose in the third quarter by the most in five years, but it wasn’t as broad based as those hypsters on the various financial bubblevision networks would have us believe as earnings at banks made up the largest part of the gain.  

Corporate profits rose 11% from the prior three months to $1.36 trillion, the biggest gain since the first quarter of 2004, according to the pro forma reporting Commerce Department. Domestically, earnings at financial institutions jumped a whopping $97 billion, or 36%, while those at other firms rose by $12.9 billion, or 2.0% (this is the result of massive taxpayer liquidity infusions and the easy-free Fed-head policies at our Federal Reserve which has spurred a massive dollar-carry trade and has helped the “too-big-to-fail-banks” as they have been the recipients of this taxpayer-bailout…they have also experienced massive returns through their propriety trading desks which I believe have benefited through insider trading activities! Firms from Goldman Sachs to Morgan Stanley boosted their earnings results last quarter through trading fixed income and outright in the commodities and the markets as they benefited nicely from the orchestrated bear-market relief rally. 

10-15-2009 Goldman Sachs reported a surge in third-quarter profit driven by trading and investments (is this repeatable) with the firm’s own money (shareholder money). Third-quarter net income more than tripled to $3.19 billion, or $5.25 a share, in the three months ended 9-25-09, from $845 million, or $1.81 a share, in past year’s third quarter, the. Revenue compared with the second quarter dropped in every division except principal investing and asset management, and earnings declined 7.2% from the second quarter’s record $3.44 billion. “Our second quarter was a record in virtually every single business,” CFO David Viniar said on the conference call. The third quarter was the firm’s third-best in equities as well as fixed income, commodities and currencies, he said.

Third-quarter revenue at Goldman Sachs doubled to $12.4 billion from $6.04 billion last year. Value-at-risk, a measure of how much the firm estimates it could lose in a single day of trading, fell to $238 million from a record $245 million in the second quarter. Revenue from fixed-income, currency and commodity trading, or FICC, surged to $5.99 billion from $1.60 billion in last year’s third quarter. Equities revenue rose to $2.78 billion from $1.56 billion.

Compensation, the company’s biggest single expense, accounted for 43% of revenue (huge claw-back from shareholders) to total $5.35 billion in the third quarter. So far this year, Goldman Sachs has set aside $16.7 billion to pay employees, compared with just $11.4 billion after the first three quarters of last year…and the yearly total is yet to be announced….insiders are getting rich off of the utilization of taxpayer and shareholder monies!  

Goldman Sachs has also benefited from massive Federal Reserve support, government backing on about $31 billion of debt, and was one of the largest recipients of funds from the bailout of AIG where they were paid $1.00 on every dollar at risk.  

Other firms have prospered greatly by cutting costs (the Chain-Saw Al Dunlop mentality, indicating they will not be quick at all to add too payrolls as it would negatively impact their bottom lines. The weakness in the non-financials tells us just how limited this so called stellar recovery is at this point. Businesses are going to be very cautious in increasing the cost side of the equation, and most often the biggest part of the cost side is labor; so I seriously doubt that they are going to rush out and start to hire ant time soon. Many firms are already exploring additional labor cost cutting measures (out sourcing). 

These profit figures, included in the Commerce Department’s second estimated report on GDP for the third quarter were the first look at total earnings. The data showed the world’s largest economy grew at a 2.8% annual pace from July through September, less than the government estimated last month (3.5%), as consumer spending trailed forecasts significantly (consumers account for 70% of GDP). 

In the first three quarters of 2009, profits at financial institutions soared 198%, the biggest nine-month gain since records began in 1948; (note: earnings were down 65% in the nine months ended in December 2008, the biggest such decrease on record. The financials were a train wreck and in my opinion the firms were coming off such a low basis that it’s easy to see a huge headline increase. The jump in profits is definitely not evenly close to being distributed evenly among banks, making it very less likely that the money will find its way back into the economy in the form of loans (Goldman will pay out $0.45+/- for every dollar in profit in bonuses to their insiders).   

On a side note….its interesting to see that Goldman Sachs, which got $10 billion and debt guarantees from the U.S. government in October 2008, is on pace for the best year in the firm’s history and get this they are only paying 1.0% in taxes!

Worse yet Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley are looking to give India over $1 billion in IT outsourcing contracts. Hell of a way to thank American taxpayers and American workers.

 

 

Technically Speaking

Weekend  Weekly Analysis         11/30/200

Even after the stunning stock market losses people were suffering at this time last Thanksgiving and now we can reflect on the tremendous gains the market has bestowed since the March lows. Yet for those poor folks who closely watch the fate of their money that they put into 401(k)/IRAs the gains of the past 12 months have failed to provide much solace. As folks who blindly followed wall-streets advice and invested money at the start of this decade in the SPX still have 25% less of it, excluding dividends of course which have been evaporating an alarming rate!  Many Americans remain deeply worried about their money and have grown increasing mistrustful of Wall Street and the government leaders entrusted to watch over the financial systems.

This sentiment may weigh on the equity markets in the future: I believe that this rally is very fragile, and cash from individual investors and others is desperately needed to build on it (what I so often refer to as a new round of bagholders).  After two 50+ percent sell-offs in the stock market in less than a decade (Dot-Com bubble bursting and then the Credit-Debacle), a near miss with anther depression and an unrelenting unemployment rate that keeps crawling higher, folks do not feel safe at all to re-enter the shark infested investment-cesspool, so where is the next round of bagholders going to come from? 

Those on the various bubble-vision-networks want us to believe that in general investors should be acting like they are on the top of the world after this year's monster relief rally from the March lows. But as many Americans stand back and compare the stock market rally to that of the actual economy (the economy where they reside) an atmosphere of distrust as once again those on Wall Street reap the huge rewards (made with taxpayer and other people’s money) and the average American doesn't get anything of substance once again; as such there is I believe a growing sense of unfairness and bewilderment.

The reluctance to trust Wall Street and the stock market has shown up in overall investing behavior. To observe individual investors, I like to watch the flow of money in and out of mutual funds. During the market downturn between October 2007 and March, investors pulled about $215 billion out of U.S. stock funds, according to TrimTabs Investment Research. And early in the current rally, investors put about $30 billion back into the stock funds…a huge disproportion of funds. But since then, the money that went into the stock funds has been started to be withdrawn, and investors have preferred the relatively lower-risk bond funds, pouring in over $340 billion this year.

 


VOLUME on the bullish side is worsening as the days wear on.....When I see decisive breaks below the bottom boundary lines of Rising Bearish Wedges for the Dow, SPX, and NDX I will be announcing that a major/major top is occurring. I’m also seeing increased bearish divergences between price and actual market breadth, price and volume, and price and momentum indicators that I follow for longer-term significant market moves. Please watch the weekly MACD indicators which are showing very distinct signs of respective topping patterns in the various indexed and are now starting to curl over which is a very bearish signal.

The concept behind MACD is fairly straightforward. Essentially, it calculates the difference between an instrument's 26-day and 12-day exponential moving averages (EMA). Of the two moving averages that make up MACD, the 12-day EMA is obviously the faster one, while the 26-day is slower one. In their calculation both moving averages use the closing prices of whatever period is measured, in the sector I watch for longer term moves (I use the weekly chart). On the MACD chart, a nine-day EMA of MACD itself is plotted as well, and it acts as a trigger for buy and sell decisions. MACD generates a bullish signal when it moves above its own nine-day EMA, and it sends a sell sign when it moves below its nine-day EMA.

Since this bear-market leg has started we have experienced 2-distinct and significant relief up-waves (wave 1 and 3 of a 5-wave pattern) and now we are embroiled in what I believe is the third (wave 5) and last wave up in this corrective pattern what I believe is a (B) wave up and I believe we are very close to finishing this up-wave!

According to my wave analysis the 1st sub-wave of the (B) corrective wave up was (a) which lasted 68-69 trading days from 3/6/09 to 6/11/2009….thereafter the second wave (b) down lasted from approximately 6/11/209 to 7/8/2009 a mere 18-trading days….and this was a very shallow retracement….here is the tricky part if wave (c-up of the B up corrective wave) tops in the next 5-10 trading days (likely in and around my next inflection period (11/6 to 11/13, we have a weekend and a holiday Veterans day on the 11thin the mix) it would mean that the (c) wave lasted approximately 68-up-days plus 18-down-days or 86+/- days now not all Elliot-wave patterns are exact-linear-counts but I would pay particular attention to the 11/9/2009 date as it would be 86-trading days from the 7/8/2009 bottom!      

Now for my bullish friends….I am issuing a serious red-flag-warning as if I’m correct and I believe that I am, when the up-leg of this (B) relief rally is completed…we will become embroiled in a very-nasty (many will be in the land-of denial) plunge, and this will be the third leg of this bear-market super-cycle-down-draft, and this plunge will catch many if not all of the perma-bulls in a state of shock and utter denial…I believe that history will be repeated and we will unfortunately plunge our economy into a deep and protracted recession (hopefully not another great-depression) 


When the U.S. stock market is flashing mixed and diverging signals like it has been lately, I turn my attention to exploring for decent entry prices for stocks that I wish to own (those with dividends and the ability to write covered calls on, a process to generate additional income while I await their consolidation and subsequent move higher.  I'm looking at the respective 100sma and more likely 200sma moving averages as potential reversal points for the sell-off I'm expecting to enter into reversal long-plays.

Remember, that when embroiled in a significant selling period when almost everything is being sold-hard, is when you must be a contrarian investors and traders and pull out your favorite COF/MA/V stock-market credit cards and become buyers (we also must be aware that the wall-street-pickpockets/thieves for the most part....have a vested interest in running this market into the end of the year if they can)

We want to be very selective in our buys and not buy just any old hyped beta stock.  Prudent investors must do their research on the stocks they're interested in buying, and then they snatch them up when the window of opportunity is open and they are selling at a discount.  I do the majority of this research for my subscribers, so they can then focus on what/when and how to buy. 

The market is driven by hedge funds, mutual funds and by mega large trading desks (which  I believe should be illegal) of the likes of Government Sachs, MS, BAC and the like…and this past year along 33-40% of market volume has been routinely attributed to program trading at Goldman Sachs. I have no idea if that GS claim is true or not but like an urban legend the story continues to make the rounds.

On a pull-back I am looking for the following retracements in the major indexes, and this is based on my experience and technical analyst; remember that I did call the March bottom several days in advance of the move. The indexes should as a minimum retrace 25-33% of these recent parabolic moves, and they could easily plunge to 50% of their lows hit in March I have outlined the various retracement levels below. 

Index Relative High March Low Spread Fib 23.6% Fib 38.2% Fib 50.0% Fib 61.80% Fib 76.40%
Dow 10,438.00 6,470.49 3,967.51 9,501.39 8,922.53 8,454.25 7,985.96 7,407.10
SPX-500 1,114.00 666.79 447.21 1,008.43 943.18 890.40 837.61 772.36
SPX-100 516.50 317.37 199.13 469.49 440.44 416.94 393.43 364.38
Nasdog 2,204.00 1,265.62 938.38 1,982.48 1,845.57 1,734.81 1,624.05 1,487.14
NDX-100 1,814.20 1,040.62 773.58 1,631.58 1,518.72 1,427.41 1,336.10 1,223.24
Russell-2000 625.02 345.01 280.01 558.92 518.06 485.02 451.97 411.11
Transports  4,059.00 2,134.31 1,924.69 3,604.64 3,323.83 3,096.66 2,869.48 2,588.67
SOX 337.20 188.21 148.99 302.03 280.29 262.71 245.12 223.38
SPY 111.69 67.10 44.59 101.16 94.66 89.40 84.13 77.63
DIA 104.63 64.78 39.85 95.22 89.41 84.71 80.00 74.19
SMH 26.92 15.64 11.28 24.26 22.61 21.28 19.95 18.30
OIH 132.39 64.65 67.74 116.40 106.52 98.52 90.52 80.64
XLE 60.56 37.40 23.16 55.09 51.71 48.98 46.25 42.87
XLF 15.76 5.88 9.88 13.43 11.99 10.82 9.65 8.21

 

The Dow lost 154.48 points on Friday and  only 8.24-points for the week....(so the downdraft was centered almost entirely on Friday (we saw an intra-week high of 10,495+/-) before ending the week at 10,309.92 in a light volume environment which was controlled by prop-desk-trading programs and hedge-funds/mutual funds painting their books as they ready to close them for the year.......Dubai's debt crisis rattled the world financial markets Friday, raising concerns that some banks could further tighten lending and stall the global economic recovery....The possible spillover effects centered on fears that international banks could suffer big losses if Dubai's investment arm defaulted on its $60 billion debt. Stock and commodity markets tumbled right from the onset.....The index ended the week at 10,309.92 and has been on a parabolic ramp since the March 6th lows producing a stellar rally of 3,850+/- or 60% in just 8+/- months a very remarkable parabolic bear-market relief rally (I'm still expecting a pull back of 9-15% in the next several weeks from the recent relative high of  10,439) looking for a test of the 9,050-9,125 level.....if we see subsequent selling on Monday....there is little real support till we reach the 10,234 level the 21ema....we have the weekly 50sma looming thereafter at 9,977+/- and thereafter  (the October 2nd low of  9,430 is a pivotal level as well......If the bulls return on Monday they will look to re-take 10375+/- thereafter we have OHR at  10455 this is where the Dow could  run into significant OHR.

 

 

 

The DOW-Transports....was a loser on Friday losing 49.48-points, and for the week it lost 22.68 points  (the index closed out the week at 3,922.84) and the index has breeched to the downside the 21Dema at 3925.00 (we need to see if its only a temporary breech or something bigger!  Its worth noting that the up-days are trading at 89% of the 30-day average volume these past 2-weeks while the down days are trading 152% of the 30-day average volume, a bearish divergence worth watching....We closed right below the weekly 100sma at 3980 and below the daily 21ema at 3,924...we will find out on Monday which camp still has the juice....the daily chart appears to have hit a triple top and been repelled....a breech of 3,875 to the downside would be very negative....and there would be little support till 3,750...on the weekly charts we are still on a bearish confirmed rollover!      If the bulls somehow managed to muster some buying interest and return in a buying mood on Monday look for them to attempt to retake OHR  3,975 thereafter 4025 (we have a have brick wall of OHR 4,055) if crude prices continue to move lower in response to weaker economic conditions and or a stronger dollar the transports could find some mixed tonality......if the bears return in a ravenous mood; they will likely attempt to retest the the 3,750+/- level thereafter there is support thereafter 3,669-3,674 level if this level fails the bears will certainly have their sights on 3,500 level of significant support, the weekly chart which was in a confirmed a sell-signal has turned to neutral! Please note the longer-term charts are overbought   Transports Daily Chart           Transports Weekly Chart  

 

 

 

 

 

 

The SPX  was hit hard on Friday as Dubai's debt crisis rattled world financial markets Friday, raising concerns that some banks could further tighten lending and stall the global economic recovery....the index was weak from the get go (due to negative futures action) and it dropped 19.14-points or 1.72% on Friday and but some how it manage to eke out a bullish close for the week gaining 0.11 points to close out the week at  1,091.49, (well off the intraweek high of 112.38+/-) as I said before the index is looking very tired here and we could be very close to a 14-21% retracement cycle....markets do not move in a straight line so even though I'm expecting a 14-21% correction from the highs (a drop of 150+/- points)....I would not expect it to come with out full-filling a likely ABC corrective pattern......the SPX has been on a wild parabolic rocket ride during the second quarter as the index had surged 434+/- or  66% from the March lows.....as I showed in the charts last week the index appeared extremely top heavy and my propriety trading systems were again flashing a multitude of negative volume divergences, and near-term topping patterns (likely top 1,114-1,120).....I’m also seeing increased bearish divergences between price and actual market breadth, price and volume, and price and momentum indicators that I follow for longer-term significant market moves. Please watch the weekly MACD indicators which are showing signs of topping and are now starting to curl over a very bearish signal. After this weeks whipsawing reversal we somewhat oversold near-term but on the flip-side many of the charts are also sporting potential H&S patterns so we could experience renewed selling  on Monday if the bad-news-bears continue to smell blood  there is little real concrete support till 1070+/- (the 50Dsma = 1073.90) the daily chart is also rolling over from overbought conditions and be have a bearish Stochastic crossover both very negative near-term.... and the weekly chart has established bearish crossovers and negative divergences....so I would be a cautious dip buyer in the zone of 1040-1050, for a near-term oversold relief rally, maybe back to 1073+/-  I warned you all last week of some renewed volatility, as the weekly charts are still displaying multiple negative divergences and they have signaled a SELL-signal (still in effect).....The weekly charts are close to forming the top side of a Diamond-topping pattern?. Diamond patterns usually form over several months in very active markets. The Diamond Top pattern occurs because prices create higher highs and lower lows in a broadening pattern. Then the trading range gradually narrows after the highs peak and the lows start trending upward. The Technical Analysis occurs when prices break downward out of the diamond formation?.....Consider the duration of the pattern and its relationship to your trading time horizons! . I still believe we could see a significant pullback as we have a bearish crossover on the weekly charts, and a bearish drop out of the rising wedge formation. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Nasdog was a distinct loser on Friday dropping a whopping 37.61-points or 1.73% during a light  volume shortened trading day where we saw distinct whipsawing back and forth after the initial gap-down due to the malaise centered around the debt issue in Dubai....for the week it lost 7.60-points to close out the week at 2,138.44....as you can see that the majority of the weakness was established on Friday.....the NDX-100...lost 28.21-points or 1.57% points on Friday (showing a tad bit more strength than the Nasdog) as for the week it closed green by 1.07-points the week, showing that profit taking was prevalent in the large cap sector.....closing out the week at 1765.46 (well off the 1801 intra-week high though)......the Nasdog/NDX were the recent leaders of the relief rally off of the March lows and the main drivers of this bear-market relief rally....and now they are displaying a multitude of negative divergences and light volume rallies and heavy volume sell-offs....as I said last week the respective P/E of the lead sled-dogs in the technology environment are very stretched....priced overly to perfection in my opinion!  If the bulls return in a buying mood on Monday  they will attempt to regain the 2,149-2155 level of significant OHR on the Nasdog thereafter we have OHR now at 2,180-2184+/-...The charts are still displaying a plethora of negative divergences......If the bears return on Monday in a ravenous mood they will likely attempt to de-horn the bulls and knock the stuffing out of them as they have been bloodied significantly during the past several weeks on numerous short-squeezes...as such the bears will look to take the index back down to 2,099-2105 thereafter we have support at the 2,055+/-level.

 

 

 

 

 

The Russell-2000 was a loser on Friday, losing 14.98-points and  this index needs to be watched very closely as the negative divergences are still growing and expanding and it has started to show some serious signs of internal weakness as I have written about for several weeks now and these divergences are weighing heavily on the small/mid-cap players the speculative playground of mutual fund managers! and it lost  7.47 points on the week closing out the week at 577.21....(since the high posted on 10-19-2009....624.13 this once "leader of the pack" has been a laggard....this index is historically a speculative playground for the high beta-players and growth speculators and like the Nasdog it had been a stellar winner during the past 8-9+/- months relief rally. The index is over-sold on a near-term basis....and is sitting right on the 100-Dsma at 578.00. The daily-chart is starting to roll-over and a breech of the 100Dsma could result in the index dropping rapidly down to the 556-557 level. The bearish bias is still prevalent as the weekly charts are still portraying a very-negative roll-over as  after we broke down through the rising wedge formation as I suggested we would last week.

If the bulls return in a buying mood on Monday look for them to assault the 587-590 level thereafter 600+/-....if the bad-news bears return in a nasty selling mood on Monday they could take this index down to 566-567 thereafter we have support at the 23.6% Fib retracement at 556+/-) from the March lows to the October highs) after that we have support 544-545 level.  The weekly charts are displayed bearish-divergence patterns. This is the fourth quarter and small caps are supposed to be out performing. Instead they are under performing. I have written this a dozen times in the past several weeks but it is still true. This under performance is suggesting that fund managers are still very skittish of the market. This is  bearish signal.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dollar, our precious greenback

The U.S. dollar has been enjoying a tiny respite from its declining trend over the past two months, as evident on the dollar index chart.   As it bounced from the 74.24 level.  We are forming what I believe to be a perfect falling wedge pattern pattern, which is a TYPICAL reversal pattern...Only time will tell

The dollar index has near-term solid support at 73.50-74.00 and now since we saw a little fight to the Dollar on Friday it needs to rally back up to and breech the OHR at 77.00 and then I will call this rebound as a near-term bull-market in the greenback....and look for a run to 82.00+/- ....which could be a distinct sign of further weakness for commodities and energy stocks and precious metals, and some small benefits  for Americans)…and if this happens look for commodities to continue their near term drop-off.  As I said last week I have seen similar consolidation patterns on the EUR/USD and the AUD/USD, and both appeared to be ready for a near-term  to be readying for a breakout to the upside. However if we see additional geopolitical instability, the dollar strength could surge hard and a break out of the dollar index above 80.00 would indicate a near-term trend change, and generate a massive short squeeze in the greenback!.

Note; When I generally think about the government’s exploding debt levels, I don’t generally focus on interest payments….but I took a few minutes and did just that this weekend and its staggering. Those payments will likely total $4.8 trillion over the next 10 years (payments we are leaving future generations). Right now thanks to the easy money policies at the Fed interest rates are near zero, thanks to the Federal Reserve’s massive monetary stimulus; but at some point the Fed will have to reverse this easing and wow what a problem out debt will face. When interest rates rise, even a small amount, the interest payments go up a lot because of the size of the massive humungous debt-level. We’re in hock as a nation like never before. Neither the administration nor Congress has any plan to change that and we will likely lose our leadership status as a result of it; and both the actual and hidden costs of our debt are rising every day.


Bubble bubble toil and trouble…..The Obama administration is working hard to spin its current monetary policy to the American people (who for the most part are financially ignorant) as is Congress, so they are able to spin the rhetoric as a reasonable effort to jump-start the nation’s economy and avoid a deep recession or depression, their efforts so far….put free/easy money into the hands of those responsible for the credit debacle and they will right their wrongs (what a fare) they have for the most part failed to get stimulus money into the hands of those who consume! So far their approach has included monetization via a near zero Federal Funds rate and so-called quantitative easing in which the numbnuts at the central bank have purchased short-term assets such as federal debt securities and corporate bonds from banks and other lenders using money that it has effectively printed like monopoly money. Their rationale and plan was to increase the overall money supply by encouraging lenders to extend debt (which they have not to date) while simultaneously decreasing the cost of borrowing. In this way the government hoped to stimulate the economy. Of course the contagion that lurks behind this ponzi scheme is that there is no guarantee that the lecherous lenders will actually lend (so far they have not been doing so) their funds….instead they have been simply padding their trading accounts and increasing their deteriorating reserves.

This irresponsible tactic of their *called economic policy* in my opinion has produced a tidal wave of financial outflows into foreign equities and financial assets, and that outflow is intermingling with similar resource flows emanating from every other nation who has also engaged in a similar stimulus program. Granted, this economic outflow has also a stimulated a massive inflow of capital via an accumulation of foreign exchange reserves from international central banks and has financed the ever-growing federal deficits. However, this policy has likewise contributed to a Hindenburg ballooning stock market bubble across the globe especially in the U.S. and has fueled a very dangerously and likely a very volatile asset bubble in various commodities!  Recently the head of China’s central bank sounded the alarm regarding the dangers of the various ballooning asset bubbles, as is the International Money Fund, the World Bank and central banks around the globe; after recently been burned by the asset bubble created by the lecherous lending practices of banks within the U.S. housing market.

Economic Releases for the Week of   11/30/2009

Date

ET

Release

For

Consensus

Prior

November  30 09:45 Chicago PMI Nov 53.0 54.2
December 01 10:00 Construction Spending Oct 0.4% 0.8%
December  01 10:00 ISM Manufacturing Index Nov 54.8 55.7
December  01 10:00 Pending Home Sales Oct 0.5% 6.1%
December  01 14:00 Auto Sales Nov NA NA
December  01 14:00 Truck Sales Nov NA NA
December  02 07:30 Challenger Job Cuts Nov NA 50.7%
December  02 08:15 ADP Employment Report Nov 148,000 -203,000
December  02 10:30 Crude Inventories 11/27 NA 1.02M
December  02 14:00 Fed Beige Book Nov    
December  03 08:30 Initial Claims 11/28 483K 466K
December  03 08:30 Continuing Claims 11/21 5517K 5423K
December  03 08:30 Productivity-Revision Q3 8.5% 9.5%
December  03 08:30 Employment Cost Index Q3 NA 0.4%
December  03 10:00 ISM Services Nov 51.5 50.6
December  04 08:30 Nonfarm Payrolls Nov 114,000 190,000
December  04 08:30 Unemployment Rate Nov 10.2% 10.2%
December  04 08:30 Average Workweek Nov 33.1 33.0
December  04 08:30 Hourly Earnings Nov 0.2% 0.3%
December  04 10:00 Factory Orders Oct 0.1% 0.9%