|
|
T-Waves
Current OUT-Look for the various Indexes/Sectors
|
|
Index
|
Near-Term
|
Intermediate Term |
Longer-Term |
|
DOW |
Neutral/Bearish |
Bearish |
Bearish |
|
SPX |
Neutral/Bearish |
Bearish |
Bearish |
|
Nasdog |
Neutral/Bearish |
Bearish |
Bearish |
|
Russell-2000 |
Neutral/Bearish |
Bearish |
Bearish |
I’m still seeing
smart money selling into strength
time and time again; a clear indication of distribution. As such
please take on
LONG
positions very carefully at these levels as the risk to being long at
these levels is compounding every day especially in over-bought
technology and consumer-cyclicals and retailers
Strap-yourselves, as it
is sure to be another wild another
wild
rollercoaster ride!! The
question is do you want a ticket to partake of this amusement ride
I believe we are close to another major inflection period for the
markets, so please trade
cautiously
and be quick to protect profits. Please remember folks there are
usually 7-8 bullish (participants) to every 2+/- bearish
traders/investors, so the propensity for bullishness is almost always
stronger, as no one wants to be a party pooper, especially those funds
that are playing with other people’s money as they attempt to pad
their books into their fiscal-year end!
However the reason that the market usually
drops
4-5 times faster then it goes up is liquidity, when selling picks up is a
contagion and the lack of buyers due to
fear,
can feed on itself very quickly like a plague or a quick acting
cancer, as such markets plunge (normally) quicker than they go up!
I'm turning very bearish right now
(see my technical section below)....and I will utilize any bullishness
on Monday to establish some longer term (2-4 month, Short positions
*or Puts* as we would need to breech the relative near-tern highs for
me to change my bias outlook....as such I'm looking to establish call
positions and outright positions in the inverse leveraged funds....see
a partial list below (we could also use a put-write strategy as well
(example of a put-write play, we could write/sell the January 2010 SDS
$36 strike puts for $1.92 taking in $192.00 per contract, if they are
pus to us at $36.00 we have a built in protective stop-loss of
$1.92)....I'm also looking to SHORT a host of high-beta high P/E
stocks as well (like AAPL, AMZN, PCLN)
In a
nut shell I'm looking for the resurgence of a very significant
correction to take the bulls by the bulls in the days/weeks ahead and
slap the bulls about...as the greenback is more oversold than at any time
in history, way to many folks all leaning to the Short-side of the
dollar market!! See my in depth analysis below
of various market conditions!
These instruments provide some extra-leverage when trading
the various sectors You
could also look at utilizing the SHORT 2x-leveraged
Pro-Shares
ProShares-Website
-
FXP
(attempts to
replicate the {2x} of a
SHORT the China-25 Index
-
RXD (attempts to
replicate the {2x} of a
SHORT the Dow Health Care Index
-
QID
(attempts to
replicate the {2x} of a
SHORT the NASDAQ-100 Index
-
SDS
(attempts to replicate the
{2x} of a
SHORT the S&P 500 Index
-
MZZ
(attempts to replicate the
{2x} of a
SHORT the S&P Mid-Cap 400 Index
-
DXD
(attempts to
replicate the
{2x} of a
SHORT the Dow Jones
Industrial Average
-
TWM
(attempts to replicate the {2x}
of a
SHORT the Russell-2000
-
SKK
(attempts to
replicate the {2x} of a
SHORT the Russell-2000
Growth
-
SSG
(attempts to replicate the {2x}
of a
SHORT the
Semiconductors
-
REW
(attempts to replicate the {2x}
of a
SHORT the Ultra technology
-
SKF
(attempts to replicate the {2x}
of a
SHORT the Ultra
Financial
Emerging Markets
BEAR 3x EDZ,
Financial
BEAR 3x FAZ, Energy
BEAR 3x
ERY, Developed Markets
BEAR 3x
DPK, Technology
BEAR 3x
TYP, Large Cap
BEAR 3x
BGZ, Small Cap
BEAR 3x
TZA, Mid Cap
BEAR 3x
MWN
Direxion link
For reference only LONG-2x-leveraged
Pro-Shares
-
QLD
(attempts to replicate the
{2x} of a Long
the NASDAQ-100 Index
-
SSO
(attempts to replicate the
{2x} of a Long
the S&P 500 Index
-
MVV
(attempts to replicate the
{2x} of a Long
the S&P Mid-Cap 400 Index
-
DDM
(attempts to replicate the
{2x} of a Long
the Dow Jones Industrial Average
-
UWM
(attempts to replicate the {2x}
of a Long the Russell-2000
-
UKK
(attempts to
replicate the {2x} of a Long the Russell-2000 Growth
-
USD
(attempts to replicate the {2x}
of a Long the Semiconductors
-
ROM
(attempts to replicate the
{2x} of a Long
the Ultra technology
-
UYG
(attempts to replicate the {2x}
of a Long the Ultra Financial
Emerging Markets Bull 3x EDC,
Financial Bull 3x FAS, Energy Bull 3x
ERX, Developed Markets Bull 3x
DZK, Technology Bull 3x
TYH, Large Cap Bull 3x
BGU, Small Cap Bull 3x
TNA, Mid Cap Bull 3x
MWJ
I had expected a shortened trading
session of subdued proportions following the Thanksgiving holiday, but
sellers moved briskly into position as they pressure stocks downward
(especially the high-beta high P/E speculative names) amid news of
credit troubles in Dubai. Their actions gave the stock market its
worst single-session percentage drop of the month and caused
volatility (VIX, VXN) to spike. Basically it was news that the Dubai
government took charge of restructuring their corporate flagship,
Dubai World, and asked creditors to defer payments of some $20 billion
of debt due in the next 18 months that provided a profit taking
catalyst. We saw that the selling pressure ebbed prior to the opening
bell, stocks still started the session sharply lower...and this
weakness reflected thru the European major indices that were trading
during Thursday's (our holiday). I believe it was just a reminder to
those who participated in the rally off of the March lows a reason to
lock in gains from the market's 8+/- month rally. Amid the pressure,
many global participants looked to establish positions in what is
perceived as quality; so initially it favored the U.S. dollar
(long-trade), which exacerbated weakness among stocks early on.
However the greenback gave up more than half of its early gains to
settle out the secession with a mere gain of just 0.3%.....the
greenback's initial advance also pressured commodities, which had
already been suffering from global selling pressure.
So as stocks sold off significantly on
Friday as U.S. investors reacted to the global sell-off triggered by a
debt crisis in Dubai, we saw that crude traded near a six-week low,
gold dropped and the dollar soared as worried investors fled riskier
assets and moved into safer havens. The stock market's sell-off began
in Europe and continued in Asia on Friday after Dubai said they would
delay debt repayments from its investment company, Dubai World. The
decision raised broader questions about the safety of emerging-market
debt and the strength of the global recovery.
A wave of selling swept across Asian
markets and into our markets on Friday (a shortened post-holiday
trading day called black-Friday for retailers), investors scrambled to
piece together how much exposure regional lenders especially those in
the Euro-land have to the financial troubles in Dubai.
Selling pressure accelerated in the
afternoon session as future’s markets indicated a sharply lower
opening. Investors were also spooked by broader fears that global
financial markets have not healed properly since last year's crisis,
and that the Dubai problem could expose these weaknesses in the
overall markets. Dubai had stated late Wednesday night (great-timing
due to the Holiday-trading environment) that they would seek a delay
in debt repayments owed by Dubai World, a state-run conglomerate with
about $60 billion in liabilities. The conglomerate has interests in
real estate, ports and the leisure industry. Dubai said it would
restructure Dubai World and announced a 6-month “standstill” on
repayments of the state-run wide-ranging conglomerate's debt. Dubai's
woes were a blow to market sentiment, serving as a reminder that
potential trouble spots remain in the world economy and things are not
what they always are hyped to be.
I don't see this as a massive contagion
just yet but it's another warning for risk-hedged investors (remember
these loose monetary conditions [and] loose lending have contributed
to various asset bubblers). And, we still have various contagions out
there [many even of a greater magnitude] and we could continue
to see these kinds of nasty surprises.
Boy-o-Boy we will surely have a horde
of economic data and geopolitical/financial news to move the markets
this week as the credit-debacle in Dubai, the non-farm payrolls data,
Black Friday/Cyber Monday and the manufacturing/service ISM reports
will be released along with the Fed tan-book this coming week, and if
that wasn’t bad enough we will have another clown show on capital hill
where Congress will have the chance to throw poison darts at Fed chief
B-52 Bernanke.
So from my vantage point the path of
least resistance for our equity market is that of profit taking as the
path is fraught with land mines (bouncing Betties) this week, and
investors and fund managers with a host of pent up profits will surely
want to bookem then gat cut off at the knees and risk losing their
bonuses.
If Dubai's debt woes intensify and
spread to other emerging markets it will quickly prompt a very quick
withdrawal from riskier assets, and Friday's sell-off will likely
carry through into this week until we reach some equilibrium.
Investors/traders will also have to
speculate and contend with any so called surprises from a Senate
Banking Committee hearing on the re- nomination of B-52 Ben Bernanke's
to a second term (I think he should be fired (and jailed for theft of
the American way of life). This hearing could provide some very ill
tasting fodder for Wall Street at a time when the Fed is facing deep
scrutiny in Congress for their massive bailout of large financial
institutions (those deemed by them as to big to fail, the very same
firms who’s deceitful and contemptuous actions caused the
credit-debacle) during the credit crisis.
I’m sure that many a congressman will ask about the Fed’s latest
banter where they stated that it could be 5-6 years before we return
to normal growth. That’s according to Fed officials in the central
bank’s latest economic forecast. They expect unemployment, now 10.2%,
to remain in a range of 6.8 to 7.5% through 2012 (wishful
thinking as I expect it to be in the range of 10.5-12.00%).
“Business contacts reported that they would be cautious in their
hiring and would continue to aggressively seek cost savings,” Fed
officials said in their minutes.
Businesses would be able to meet any increases in demand in the near
term by raising their employee’s currently depressed hours thus
delaying the need to add to their payrolls. It sure doesn't look like
the beginning of a normal, rapid recovery to this old economist. We’re
in a form of mini-depression from my vantage point which typically
happens after a prolonged period of nasty unchecked credit excesses
that result in a bubble bursting and we get asset deflation. We have
seen asset deflation, and we had a contraction in private-sector
credit.
They also may ask about….the explosion in the Fed’s balance sheet as
the Federal Reserve's balance sheet hit a new all time record of $2.23
Trillion in assets, after an $11 billion spike in MBS and Agency
purchases this week over last week. Securities held outright: $1,785
billion (an increase of $92 billion month/month, resulting from $2
billion in new Treasury purchases, which have tapered off at $776.5
billion, $79 billion increase in MBS and $12 billion in Agency Debt),
or a $11 billion increase sequentially. Net borrowings: $218 billion.
Friday's employment report for November
will be the market moving event with job losses expected to decrease
significantly from October (hell they ignore the household survey and
only focus on the establishment survey so the headline pro forma
numbers could beat expectations as the street is expecting a drop of
only 125,000 jobs from last months 190,000 reading and the whisper
number is at 105,000….I feel this is going to be a huge disappointment
for the markets).
Investors will also get an early view
of how retailers fared during Black Friday, as releases trickle in on
Monday. Both the job market and consumer spending remain among the
weakest links in the economic chain and could potentially stymie this
so called burgeoning recovery.
Remember
when in doubt
CASH
is always King/Queen. I believe we are closing in on another
MAJOR
-MAJOR significant
inflection period for the markets (11-06-11-13), so please trade
cautiously and be quick to
protect profits, as they are only a good thing when you place them
into your account.. We have a horde of economic data squeezed
into this week, so there should be plenty of great trading
opportunities! (see economic calendar below).....
If you are
LONG please trade cautiously as I believe the large trading desks can smell
blood in the water and the sharks are starting to circle.....The
markets at least at first blush last week were ignoring dismal economic
news. Primarily because bad economics news means the Fed is going to
stay on the sidelines for a long time and allow the lecherous banks to
borrow at near zero, and run up commodities to act as a tax on
Americans/others as well.
|
How
is this bullish? Some experts like Cramer and Kudlow have
repeatedly stated that the housing market has already bottomed
(back in May), but one statistic indicates otherwise and defies
their so called logic. The portion of U.S. homeowners who are “underwater”
on their home loans (that is, they owe more on the mortgage than
the home is worth) surged to a whopping 24.5% in the third
quarter, or almost 10.8 million households, according to First
American CoreLogic, a real estate research firm. Many of the
underwater homes will ultimately end up in foreclosure. Of the
10.8 million homes underwater, nearly half have a mortgage that
is at least 20% higher than the home’s value (a huge negative
contagion as this amounts to almost 6-million homes), according
to the data compiled by First American CoreLogic. More than
520,000 of these homeowners are already in default on their
mortgages. This is a huge over-hang of risk in the mortgage
markets that no one is talking about or addressing. Some
homeowners who are underwater are fully capable of paying their
mortgages, but they are in the elite group or top-wage earners
that are ditching their homes anyway to the tune of 590,000.
|
.
Truck
tonnage for September reflected in my opinion just how tepid and
lackluster this so called recovery in the real economy is according to
the ATA reports: The American Trucking Associations’ advance
seasonally adjusted (SA) For-Hire Truck Tonnage Index decreased 0.2%
in October, following a 0.3% contraction in September. The latest
decline lowered the SA index to 103.6 (2000=100) from the revised
103.8 in September. The non-seasonally adjusted index, which
represents the change in tonnage actually hauled by the fleets before
any seasonal adjustment, equaled 109.6 in October, up 1.6 percent from
September. Compared with October 2008, SA tonnage dropped 5.2%,
which was the best year-over-year showing since November 2008. In
September, the index was down 7.3% from a year earlier. The economy is
behaving with starts and stops. This is being reflected in truck
tonnage, as well as most economic indicators. The industry should
remain prepared for ups and downs in the months ahead, but the general
trend should be modest improvement. Since consumer spending and
manufacturing are not surging, trucking shouldn’t expect robust growth
either. However, both retail sales and manufacturing output are
exhibiting mild upward trend lines.
For investors, the past decade has been
like watching pain dry as their investments are mostly underwater…but
wall-street is cheering this 60-65% rally off the March bottom like
it’s a monasteries bull-market! They have been drinking spiked punch
way too long…and right now most do not care as long as it looks like
there might be a little punch left in the bowl for them to drink as
well. The risk trades are again running rampant and the propriety
trading desks are trying their best to suck in another herd-of
bagholders, who have short-term memory losses!
Astute investors should read the FDIC’s
Quarterly Banking Profile (see it below) and watch the departure of
the chief financial officer of at least 1-3 major banking institution
early next year, which will likely trigger a cascading negative affect
over the financial sector….as we could see an all hell could break
loose scenario. The number of banks on the FDIC's "problem list" rose
33% during the third quarter to 552, the highest level since 1993.
I still do not
believe that the subprime mortgage crisis has passed and
been dealt with (we have masked the problem with financial trickery
and fuzzy math accounting. The U.S. economy currently faces a very
nasty coupling of significant weaker employment conditions with a
mountain of resets on adjustable rate mortgages looming on the
horizon. These loans, written at the height of the housing bubble, and
they undoubtedly carry the highest loan-to-value ratios.
The assumption that the credit crisis
is behind us is completely out of line with reality (from my vantage
point, and all the intervention has yet to deal with the core
issues)….the inevitability of profound credit losses here is still
monstrous and unnervingly similar to the inevitability of profound
losses following the dot-com bubble but on a magnitude of 10!
According to the Mortgage Bankers
Association, nearly one in 10 homeowners with mortgages were at least
one payment behind in the third quarter, up from about one in 14
mortgage holders in the third quarter of 2008. This number is the
highest since the association began keeping records in 1972.
While the US recently reported 3.5% subsequently revised down to 2.8%
growth in the third quarter, the talking butt-heads on the various
bubblevision networks suggested that the most severe recession since
the Great Depression is well over, and that the recovery is well
underway (we’re in a new-bull-market according to the hypsters!
However as I have written about repeatedly that our economy is
actually much weaker than the so called official pro forma data
suggests. In fact, official measures of GDP may grossly overstate
growth in the economy, as it really doesn’t reflect the fact that
business sentiment especially among small firms is downright abysmal
and their output has been steadily falling off a proverbial cliff. And
if the GDP data was properly corrected for this segment, third-quarter
GDP may have been closer to 1.25% rather than 2.8%.
The story of the U.S. is, indeed like that of the “tale of two cities”
{It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age
of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief,
it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was
the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter
of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before
us,……the period was so far like the present period,} well again the
similarities are stark as we basically have two distinct economies.
There is a less significant one that is slowly recovering (where
wall-street and the financial sector flourishes) and a larger one that
is still in a deep and persistent downturn (where most Americans
reside).
Consider the following facts. While America's official unemployment
rate is already 10.2%, the figure jumps to
a whopping 17.5% when discouraged workers and partially employed
workers are included. And, while the hyped data from firms suggest
that job losses in the past 3-months were about 620,000 (the head-line
establishment numbers) the household surveys point to a far different
dismal number as it includes those folks self-employed (landscapers,
real estate brokers and general labors) and small entrepreneurs (small
business folks like me) as this number for the past 3-months comes in
very hot at over two million people unemployed; but of course those on
the various bubblevision networks do not cite this data as they are
for the most part, part of the Wall-Street spin machine.
In October, the number of unemployed persons
increased by 558,000 to 15.7
million. The overall unemployment rate rose by 0.4 percentage point to
10.2 percent, the highest rate since April 1983. Since the start of
the recession in December 2007, the number of unemployed persons has
risen by 8.2 million, and the unemployment rate has grown by 5.3
percentage points.
Moreover, the total effect on real income (the product of jobs times
hours worked times average hourly wages) has been more severe than
that implied by the job losses alone, because many firms (are taking
the Chainsaw Al Dunlop approach to managing earnings and expenses) and
they are cutting their worker’s hours, placing them on furlough or
outright reducing their wages (especially benefits) as a way to push
off costs and meet their earnings expectations.
Worse yet most if not all of the lost jobs (especially the good paying
and benefited jobs) (in construction, finance, manufacturing and real
tangible services are likely gone forever), and recent studies suggest
that a 25-30% of U.S. jobs will be fully outsourced over time to other
lower wage countries. Thus, a growing proportion of the work force
(those Americans that were big discretionary spenders) are losing real
hope of finding gainful decent employment, while the unemployment rate
(especially for poor and unskilled workers, and those about the enter
the work force {our children} will remain significantly high for a
much longer period of time than in previous recessions…and this
contagion will act like a cancer eating away at our economy in my
opinion!
Consider also the still contracting credit markets (the life blood of
growth) and even prime borrowers with good credit scores and
investment-grade firms are experiencing deteriorating credit
conditions, as the former use to have unfettered access to mortgages
and consumer credit while the latter had access to bond and equity
markets.
But non-prime borrowers (about 33% of U.S. households, now do not have
nearly as much access to mortgages and credit card credit as they use
to, (and many are tapped out). Far to many Americans are living from
paycheck to paycheck, and its becoming a difficult endeavor for they
to meet their obligations as real wages are deteriorating, owing to
the decline in hourly wages and hours worked as seen in the labor
department’s reports.
We must also reflect upon what is happening to private consumption and
real-retail sales. Recent monthly figures suggest a rise in retail
sales. But, because the official statistics capture mostly sales by
larger retailers and exclude the fall by hundreds of thousands of
smaller mom and pop stores and businesses that have failed or are
failing and the pro forma look at consumption looks better than it
really is. And, while higher-income and wealthier households have a
buffer of savings to smooth out their consumption and avoid having to
increase savings, most lower-income households must save more, as
banks and other lenders cut back on home-equity loans and lower limits
on available credit cards. It’s estimated that close to 40% of
American households are just 3-paychecks away from bankruptcy, a
dismal contagion!
Is this really a bullish development……One
of the keys to the housing market turn-around is the success of the
plethora of so called modification programs. The Treasury Department
is expected to release a key measurement the success or failure of
such programs next month and the overall number of permanent
modifications for the Making Home Affordable program (another
taxpayer-bailout). From the data I have reviewed I have seen that very
few mortgages have been permanently modified so I can’t wait to see
how the Treasury pro forma report turns out! Lenders have temporarily
restructured on the surface hundreds of thousands of loans, but
long-term changes have proved elusive (they have stretched out
payments and back loaded principle etc.) as such this data is also
raising the specter of a new wave of foreclosures (those that are not
yet disclosed on balance statements).
The Treasury Department announced in October that, after a slow start
last spring, its Making Home Affordable loan-modification initiative
had resulted in about 500,000 trial modifications. The
department said the $75-billion centerpiece of its anti-foreclosure
efforts was on track to meet its goal of offering at least
5-years of lower payments to as many as 4 million stressed-out
borrowers. But even after reporting this month that trial
modifications had topped 650,000, the government still hasn't said how
many of those loans have been permanently restructured (a very
miniscule number at best in my opinion). The Treasury Department
stated that such numbers will be in next month's report on the
program, which has been allocated $75 billion from the government's
$700-billion Troubled Asset Relief Program taxpayer bailout fund. At
this point, converting 40% of the trial modifications into long-term
restructurings would be considered a major accomplishment. As of
9-01-2009 with more than 350,000 trial modifications begun, the
program has only achieved a mere 1,711 permanent modifications (that’s
right less than 2000).
Exactly what is holding up these so
called conversions depends on whom you talk to…but the bottom line is
that Wall-Street and the mega banks win again and main-street (average
Americans) lose again; but we can not ignore the looming contagions
due to non-modifications and likely subsequent foreclosures that will
continue to escalate.
We also saw this week that
Bankruptcy cases filed in federal courts for fiscal year 2009
totaled 1,402,816, up 34.5% over the 1,042,993 filings
reported for the 12-month period ending September 30, 2008, according
to statistics released today by the Administrative Office of the U.S.
Courts. The federal Judiciary’s fiscal year is the 12-month period
ending September 30,2009. The bankruptcies reported today are for
October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009. For the 12-month period
ending September 30, 2009, business filings totaled 58,721, up 52
percent from the 38,651 business filings in the 12-month period ending
September 30, 2008. Non-business filings totaled 1,344,095, up 34%
from the 1,004,342 non-business bankruptcy filings in September
2008.
This is hardly bullish for housing or
our economy…..I
read an interesting Washington Post article on Thursday… Fannie
Mae to tighten lending standards….Banks will demand higher credit
scores, lower borrower debt….. Starting 12-12-2009, the automated
system that Fannie Mae uses to approve loans will reject borrowers
who have at least a 20% down payment but whose credit scores fall
below 620 out of 850, previously, the cut-off was 580….also, for
borrowers with a 20% down payment, no more than 45% of their gross
monthly income can go toward paying debts (this will surely knock off
many an applicant). Loans to people with credit scores below 620 have
fallen seriously delinquent at a rate approximately 9-times higher
than other loans purchased in the same period.
Fannie Mae, the giant mortgage finance company that helps shape
lending guidelines, plans next month to raise minimum credit score
requirements and limit the amount of overall debt that borrowers can
carry relative to their incomes. The changes are the latest in a
series of crackdowns by the mortgage industry and could surprise some
prospective home buyers. The industry is starting to roll back loose
lending standards that led to the mortgage meltdown and the subsequent
economic crisis. But the fear is that if the industry becomes too
restrictive, it will freeze out too
many borrowers and impede an economic recovery.
Billionaire George Soros stated this
week that he believes a “bloodletting” may be in the offing for
leveraged buyout firms (LBOs) and commercial real estate investors
amid the worst economy in seven decades. “In commercial real estate
and leveraged buyouts, the bloodletting is yet to come,” Soros said.
“These factors will continue to weigh on the American economy, and the
American consumer will no longer be able to serve as the motor for the
world economy.” Bankers across the globe have accounted for $1.66
trillion of write downs and write-offs on bad loans since the start of
the credit crisis in 2007. Moody’s Investors Service reports that the
global speculative default rate will peak at 12.5% (I
believe it peaks at 17.75%)
this quarter as the U.S. and European economies continue to struggle.
The rate rose to 12% in the third quarter, up from 2.8% just a year
ago, Moody’s reports….that’s nearly a 10% in just a mere 12 months,
and I do not see it abating soon. And as such given these facts, the
so called global economic recovery is very likely to run out of steam
very soon and that a “double-dip”
recession may emerge early in 2011. The incessant double-digit
unemployment rate is going to erode confidence like a cancer, and not
just in the financial industry.
A
contagion no one wants to speak about…..
Banks’ main worries have centered on the toxic assets on their balance
sheets during the past several years (other people’s debt that was
given out with reckless abandon by bankers and financiers). Now they
have to worry about their own debt, and it’s a massive contagion.
About $10 trillion (yes trillion) of bank debt comes due by the end of
2015 (just 6-years from now), including a whopping $7 trillion due by
2012, according to Moody's Investors Service.
Most banks will have to refinance that
debt at much higher interest rates (unless the B-52 Bernanke and the
Treasury dude Geithner are able to artificially keep rates low) than
were originally assessed on this debt. That’s because banks were able
to borrow extremely cheaply during the credit bubble of 2003 to 2007
(and they better start to roll out of that debt now)…what’s important
to remember is that we have seen taxpayer/government guarantees for
bank debt during this financial crisis which has allowed banks to
issue debt at historic low rates, but it is short-term debt which will
soon become due again and again. The average maturity of new debt
rated by Moody's dropped almost 60% since 2004 to a mere 3.1 years
according to the reports that I have read.
Worse yet it’s not just a U.S. problem,
as the average maturity for new bank debt worldwide fell almost 50% to
4.7 years during that period. “We thought that we should send a (warning)
signal to the world” Jean-Francois Tremblay, a Moody's analyst,
referring to a report the firm recently issued about the problem. I
have been sounding this warning trumpet for many months now as despite
the so called stabilization of the financial system over the past
eight months (the relief rally from the march lows), banks still face
tremendous internal contagions on their balance sheets.
I read an interesting account this past
week that hedge funds, in the third quarter, showed their greatest
appetite for stock market risk in over 2-years, according to research
from Goldman Sachs. The investment bank's latest Hedge Fund Trend
Monitor, which analyzed regulatory disclosures from 684 funds, found
these investors had amassed $604 billion of long equity positions
(this is a dangerous development as the boat is lopsided again).
Estimating these same funds had $363 billion in short positions, net
long exposure rose to 41%. This marks the highest, most bullish levels
since December 2007 as funds moved to benefit from a relentless rising
market. The equity markets rose 17% during the quarter, suggesting
that hedge fund net exposure increased as a result of active equity
buying as well as short covering. Goldman’s analysts observed that
hedge funds, though upping the ante on every sector, in particular
raised their net long exposure in financials: to 29% from 9.0% percent
in the second quarter and from net short positions last year.
In a glimmer of hope for the labor
market, the number of U.S. workers filing new claims for jobless
benefits last week fell to the lowest level since September 2008.
Total claims lasting more than one week, meanwhile, also decreased.
Initial claims for jobless benefits declined by 35,000 to 466,000 in
the week ended 11-21-09, the Labor Department said in its weekly
report. The previous week's level was revised to 501,000 from 505,000.
This represents the lowest figure for claims since 9-13-2008, and it
is the first time initial claims have fallen below the 500,000 mark
since early January. The four-week moving average of new claims, which
aims to smooth volatility in the data, also fell by 16,500 to 496,500
from the previous week's revised average of 513,000; marking the
lowest level since 11-08-2008. Although we are still at historically
high levels of claims, we have seen a notable decline and that is an
encouraging sign according to the hypsters on bubble vision that labor
market conditions are indeed improving. The pro forma trend has been
very persistent since the end of August. In a supplemental Labor
Department report the number of continuing claims those drawn by
workers for more than one week in the week ended 11-14-2009 declined
by 190,000 to 5,423,000 from the preceding week's revised level of
5,613,000.
Demand
for durable goods dropped in October (a
market negative), brought down by
the defense sector, and we saw that the so called barometer of capital
spending by businesses tumbled which is another sign in my opinion
that the so called recovery is very sluggishness at best.
Manufacturers' orders for durable goods decreased 0.6% to a seasonally
adjusted $166.17 billion, the Commerce Department said Wednesday.
Military goods demand plunged. Excluding defense, all other durables
increased by 0.4% in October, after going 1.8% higher in September.
Still, if not for a strange jump in commercial airline bookings, the
drop in overall durables would have been much worse (I
believe the airline component will take a big hit next month…..
US Airways (LCC) said this week it plans to defer the delivery of 54
Airbus jets, in a bid to improve liquidity and ease its strained
finances. The deferral will reduce the company's aircraft capital
expenditure by about $2.5 billion over the next three years). Some
manufacturers have boosted orders to slow their inventory liquidation
and rebuild depleted stockpiles of goods. The data showed to some
extent that manufacturers' inventories of durable goods were unchanged
in October, ending a string of declines.
Spending
by Americans bounced back in October (again they spent more than they
took in) as their incomes rose slightly more than expected and
inflation remained low (hell we never count commodity inflation food,
energy etc.). Commerce Department data released on Wednesday showed
spending last month
rose by 0.7%
compared with a September
decline of 0.6%,
while personal income rose by 0.2% for the second straight month. A
key gauge of prices that is closely watched by the Federal Reserve to
set monetary policy reiterated inflation wasn't a threat as the
economy recovers slowly. The core price index for personal consumption
expenditures, which excludes volatile food and energy, rose a monthly
0.2% in October and by 1.4% year-on-year. The U.S. economy's rebound
was softer than originally thought in the third quarter, as we saw in
the GDP revision which showed less consumer spending than initially
estimated. Consumer spending, which accounts for 70-73% of U.S.
economic output, increased at a 2.9% annual rate during the third
quarter less than the 3.4% estimated previously. We must acknowledge
however that Wednesday's reports were encouraging for potential growth
in the fourth quarter, since both consumer spending and incomes rose.
Personal income data for the previous months was revised up slightly.
It rose by 0.2% in September and by 0.3% in August, the report showed,
compared to previous estimates of a flat reading in September and a
0.1% increase the previous month. Still, with more than 10.2% of the
U.S. labor force out of work, the rise in incomes remains very
contained and anemic. Federal Reserve officials raised their
expectations for growth this year (see their minutes) and in 2010, but
predicted the recovery will be so slow that unemployment will remain
very high and inflation low until the end of 2010.
New-home
sales unexpectedly rose in October despite bad weather and uncertainty
over a big tax credit for first-time buyers. Sales of single-family
homes increased 6.2% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of
430,000, according to the Commerce Department on Wednesday. I thought
the looming expiration of an $8,000 tax credit for home buyers would
force these buyers to act in October. New-home sales, unlike sales of
existing homes, are recorded with the signing of a sales contract
and not the closing. {The tax credit has since been extended by
Congress through April, a move made earlier this month that is seen
helping the housing market.} Wednesday's report said sales in
September dropped 2.4% to 405,000. Year over year, sales were up 5.1%
since October 2008. Now for the negative slice of the pie….the
median price for a new home dropped in October, but not by much,
dropping 0.5% to $212,200. Inventories shrank some more. There were an
estimated 239,000 homes for sale at the end of October. That
represented a 6.7 months' supply at the current sales rate. An
estimated 250,000 homes were for sale at the end of September, a 7.4
months' inventory.
Weekly Mortgage Filings dropped this
past week despite Lower Refinancing costs…..we saw that applications
for mortgages to buy homes rose a tad last week, but the volume of
filings to refinance existing loans dropped, according to the Mortgage
Bankers Association's weekly survey. Total application volume was down
a seasonally adjusted 4.5% on a week-to-week basis, as refinancings
dropped 9.5%. The overall pace of mortgage applications also dropped
in the week ended 11/13/2009 down 2.5%. The four-week moving average
for all mortgages through 11/20/2009 was up 0.5%, the MBA's latest
survey showed. Refinancings made up 71.7% of all applications last
week, down from 74.6% the previous week. Adjustable-rate mortgages
accounted for 5.3%, up from 5.1%. The interest rate on 30-year
fixed-rate mortgages averaged 4.82%, down slightly from 4.83% the
previous week, while the rate on 15-year fixed-rate mortgages was
unchanged at an average 4.32% rate. One-year ARMs carried a 6.66%
average rate, down from 6.85% To obtain the rates, the 30-year
fixed-rate mortgage required payment of an average 1.19 points, the
15-year fixed-rate mortgage required an average 1.05 points and the
1-year ARM required an average 0.33 point. A point is 1% of the
mortgage amount, charged as prepaid interest.
We saw on Wednesday that the University
of Michigan index of consumer sentiment improved from an initial
reading earlier in the month of November
but still dropped from the
prior month, reflecting
uncertain job prospects and worsening personal financial situations.
Their consumer sentiment index rose to 67.4 from an early November
reading of 66.00. The final survey is still 4.5% lower than October's
reading of 70.6, marking the second straight monthly drop, and a
substantial drop from the 73.5 reading in September. Consumers cite
their deteriorating finances as well as their uncertainty about future
job and income prospects more than ever before in these surveys as
looming-negative-contagions, and this has turned them into very
cautious spenders (as such the strength in retailers has me a tad bit
perplexed). This University of Michigan sentiment index follows a
stronger-than-expected rise in a consumer confidence survey released
on Tuesday by the Conference Board Tuesday. The outlook for labor
conditions also worsened in the Conference Board report, which tends
to be less heavily weighted towards households' financial
situations.For retailers who are waiting for the kick-off to the
holiday shopping season, which makes its traditional launch on Friday,
there was plenty of grim news in the details of the Michigan sentiment
index.
Reuters/University of Michigan said that
when respondents were asked to explain how their finances had changed,
only 9%, or the smallest proportion in the sixty-year history of the
survey, reported income gains (wow this flies in stark contrast to the
hype on bubblevision); the largest proportion, or 38%, voluntarily
cited income declines (this
is a bad omen in my opinion for retailers).
Unease over the labor market caused a partial reversal in buying
plans, according to the University of Michigan survey. Some 39%
mentioned income uncertainty as the reason they postponed purchases
of large durable goods, such as furniture, appliances and home
electronics. The expectations index also dropped, to 66.5 in November
from 68.6 the prior month. As we are seeing negative short-term income
perceptions and weak labor markets dominating household balance-sheet
situations. As a result, I am firmly forecasting that real consumer
spending will slow to a crawl in the fourth quarter and first quarter
of 2010!
.
|
Are the
markets over-valued....or just stretched and they will fill out
their earnings
I
always find it amazing that more investors are willing to buy
stocks at Dow 10,000 than they were at Dow 6,600 after a 60%
rally, shouldn’t investors start to be concerned about
valuations…I am to some extent especially in the high-beta high
P/E trading stocks that are the hyped favorites of the propriety
trading desks.
It
seems right now that many an investor has their head buried in
the sand like an ostridge as they are hoping and praying that
the greater fool theory hold true to form.
The
greater fool theory (sometimes I like to call it the idiot fool
theory) is the premise and belief held by an investor or trader
who makes a questionable investment/trade, that they will get
bailed out with a profit as the assumption is that they will be
able to sell it later to “a bigger fool/bagholder” in other
words they historically buy equities or an asset not because
they believe that it is worth the price, but rather because they
believe that they will be able to sell it to someone else at a
higher price!
Now
I’m going to talk about asset valuations which is the ability to
grasp what’s not evident or obvious to the average investor that
is caught up in the hype of the momentum of the markets. This
implies that discerning investors will have to look beyond the
general train of thought being promoted on the various
bubblevision networks by those talking up their books (and
looking for the next-herd of bagholders), in order to attain a
balanced and educated opinion as to real valuations of assets
and equities!
Right now we have seen that the major U.S. benchmarks (SPX, Dow,
Nasdog) have rallied 60% and some a tad more since their
respective March lows (the often hyped bear-market bottom). And
as such it’s logical to infer that these stocks are more
expensive today than they were eight months ago.
Ironically, more investors are now willing, strange as it may
be, too buy equities with the Dow trading above 10,000 than they
were at Dow 6,500; and worse yet the same economists and
analysts who didn’t see the bear-market evolving or anticipate
the so called March market bottom or the 2007 market top, are
now telling the herd (investing public) that the recession is
over and the storm has passed and all is right with the world
again. Even though this irony should be very obvious, it’s
hardly publicized or acknowledged, as to do so would be bad for
Wall Street, and good for average investors to be reminded of
these facts…it I this type of short-term memory loss that
Wall-Street prays for and that makes the average Wall Street
firm a proverbial trend chasing machine.
However bucking the trend has proved to be a very profitable
strategy for myself and for my subscribers for many years now as
I was calling for a bottom when the Dow was trading at 6,600 and
the SPX at 680 when the majority of fund managers and many on
Wall Street were in hyper panic mode, as I was preparing my
subscribers for what I believed to be a massive short-covering
bear market relief rally (though I must be truthful, the rally
has run more than I thought was possible).
As I
have always said there are times to follow a trend and then
there are times to reverse against it; but I must note that
getting caught on the wrong side of a trend can prove a costly
if you do not utilize good money management.
I
have always looked to valuation metrics as one way to discern
the longer-term trend for the markets. And as such we must
understand when a P/E ratio does not equal a real P/E ratio. As
you can recollect from accounting 101 P/E is simply a
measurement of a firm’s profitability when compared to its stock
price, and as such the price to earnings (P/E) ratio is one of
the easiest and most accepted valuation matrixes utilized by
value investors!
What
is not commonly known though (as Wall-Street spends a lot of
money masking the true numbers), is that there are different
ways to calculate P/E ratios; and unfortunately for the average
uninformed investor not all roads lead to the same P/E ratio
result. In fact, the various computations are like an analogy
to an object’s length expressed in centimeters, millimeters or
inches, as such P/E ratios of the same index or firm will vary
depending on the methodology used as the basic foundation for
the once thought of basic calculation.
To
explore the various approaches that bubblevision, Wall-Street
analysts and real value investors utilize is a bit technical.
The P/E ratio is attained by the interaction between two basic
variables, price and earnings.
The
“Price” part of the equation is always obvious (its where
the stock is trading) and easily determined by a looking at
various end-of-day price services. Unfortunately the second part
of the equations called “Earnings” is wrought with fuzzy
math calculations and pro forma data as there are different
methods to calculate earnings. So you can see that the final P/E
ratio depends on which two of the following four components are
used as a foundation for the earnings component:
-
Operating earnings
-
Reported earnings
-
Top down analysis,
mostly a
consensus from analysts that are historically wrong
-
Bottom up analysis,
mostly a
consensus from analysts that are historically wrong
o Operating
earnings: include income from the sale of goods and services.
Not included in this calculation of costs are expenses related
to marketing, layoffs, financing, M&A and other so called
miscellaneous numbers. Operating earnings almost always tend to
be higher as corporations massage them and “omit” expenses that
have to be included for real reported earnings. Higher or
inflated earnings result in artificially lowered P/E
ratio…making their firms look more attractive to value
investors!
o Reported
earnings are based on generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) [Wall-Street hates GAAP accounting], which provides a
“cookie-cutter” type earnings report that allows for an apples
to apples comparison between firms and does not allow firms to
omit unfavorable factors when making earnings determinations.
o Bottom
up estimates are based on the individual earnings from each
firm. The estimates are put together from the consensus
returns published by individual stock analysts covering the
various firms (many with self serving relationships). Adding up
individual earnings numbers, yields earnings for indexes or
sectors.
o Top
down is an estimate of earnings based on the broad economic
indicators many of whish are vastly overstated and
over-estimated such as GPD growth, inflation, interest
rates, etc. We see that the various economists’ forecasts are
reduced down to sectors or markets. As such historically top
down forecasts tend to result in vastly lower P/E ratios.

P/E
ratios based on top down operating earnings tend to be at the
lower end of the spectrum, while P/E ratios based on bottom up
reported earnings tend to be on the higher end. Additionally,
the P/E ratio can be based on projected earnings. A P/E ratio
based on projected 2010 earnings would be lower than a
P/E ratio based on actual 2009 earnings, since earnings are
almost always expected to increase as the majority of analysts
get their numbers from the firms they cover, and it’s in their
best interest to project earnings increases.
Its
interesting to note that the numbers currently listed on
Standard and Poor’s website for top down operating earnings P/E
ratio is 27.78 (the highest reading since 2002)
and it gets better as the number comes in at
85.55
for top down when looking at reported earnings (the highest ever
recorded).
And
these folks are living on cloud nine as year-to-date reported
earnings for the SPX came in at $36.09; and right now top down
estimates for 2010 are north of $81.00 so as mentioned above,
top down earnings are distilled based on broad economic data
expectations such as GDP; and we have recently seen that the
preliminary Q3 2009 GDP which was originally reported at 3.5%,
was revised lower due to lower than expected retail sales, the
trade deficit and other factors, and now the second revision to
GDP was lowered to 2.8% just a few days ago. So from my vantage
point in my investing career using P/E ratios based on
projections is futile (a Borg term). Rather than taking a gamble
using highly hyped and vastly overstated projected numbers, I
have utilized in my career actual, reported data, wow a new
concept for those on bubblevision and on Wall-Street.
And
now that I’ve gotten all the technical P/E crap out of the way,
let’s get back to what I call the real basics of investing
(buying firms that are not over-valued but undervalued).
Regardless of which P/E ratio you choose to use, P/E ratios and
by extension stocks are grossly overvalued. As the chart below
shows, P/E ratios have reached levels never seen before. Notice
the red line titled “valuation reset.”
No
bear market has ever ended unless P/E ratios dropped into the
lower range (green
line) below the
valuation level where stocks are attractive to own; and
currently we have never before seen such a large spread between
P/E ratios and the historic market bottom levels.
|
Corporate profits
Profits at U.S. firms rose in the third
quarter by the most in five years, but it wasn’t as broad based as
those hypsters on the various financial bubblevision networks would
have us believe as earnings at banks made up the largest part of the
gain.
Corporate profits rose 11% from the
prior three months to $1.36 trillion, the biggest gain since the first
quarter of 2004, according to the pro forma reporting Commerce
Department. Domestically, earnings at financial institutions jumped a
whopping $97
billion, or 36%, while
those at other firms rose by $12.9 billion, or
2.0%
(this is the result of massive taxpayer liquidity infusions and the
easy-free Fed-head policies at our Federal Reserve which has spurred a
massive dollar-carry trade and has helped the “too-big-to-fail-banks”
as they have been the recipients of this taxpayer-bailout…they have
also experienced massive returns through their propriety trading desks
which I believe have benefited through insider trading activities!
Firms from Goldman Sachs to Morgan Stanley boosted their earnings
results last quarter through trading fixed income and outright in the
commodities and the markets as they benefited nicely from the
orchestrated bear-market relief rally.
10-15-2009 Goldman Sachs reported a
surge in third-quarter profit driven by trading and investments
(is this repeatable) with the firm’s own money (shareholder money).
Third-quarter net income more than tripled to
$3.19 billion, or $5.25 a
share, in the three months
ended 9-25-09, from $845 million, or $1.81 a share, in past year’s
third quarter, the. Revenue compared with the
second quarter dropped in
every division except
principal investing and asset management, and earnings
declined 7.2%
from the second quarter’s record $3.44 billion. “Our second quarter
was a record in virtually every single business,” CFO David Viniar
said on the conference call. The third quarter was the firm’s
third-best in equities as well as fixed income, commodities and
currencies, he said.
Third-quarter revenue at Goldman Sachs
doubled to $12.4 billion from $6.04 billion last year. Value-at-risk,
a measure of how much the firm estimates it could lose in a single day
of trading, fell to $238 million from a record $245 million in the
second quarter. Revenue from fixed-income, currency and commodity
trading, or FICC, surged to $5.99 billion from $1.60 billion in last
year’s third quarter. Equities revenue rose to $2.78 billion from
$1.56 billion.
Compensation, the company’s biggest
single expense, accounted for 43% of revenue (huge claw-back from
shareholders) to total $5.35 billion in the third quarter. So far this
year, Goldman Sachs has set aside $16.7 billion to pay employees,
compared with just $11.4 billion after the first three quarters of
last year…and the yearly total is yet to be announced….insiders are
getting rich off of the utilization of taxpayer and shareholder
monies!
Goldman Sachs has also benefited from
massive Federal Reserve support, government backing on about $31
billion of debt, and was one of the largest recipients of funds from
the bailout of AIG where they were paid $1.00 on every dollar at risk.
Other firms have prospered greatly by
cutting costs (the Chain-Saw Al Dunlop mentality, indicating they will
not be quick
at all to add too payrolls as it would negatively impact their bottom
lines. The weakness in the non-financials tells us just how limited
this so called stellar recovery is at this point. Businesses are going
to be very cautious in increasing the cost side of the equation, and
most often the biggest part of the cost side is labor; so I seriously
doubt that they are going to rush out and start to hire ant time soon.
Many firms are already exploring additional labor cost cutting
measures (out sourcing).
These profit figures, included in the
Commerce Department’s second estimated report on GDP for the third
quarter were the first look at total earnings. The data showed the
world’s largest economy grew at a 2.8% annual pace from July through
September, less than the government estimated last month (3.5%), as
consumer spending trailed forecasts significantly (consumers account
for 70% of GDP).
In the first three quarters of 2009,
profits
at financial institutions soared 198%, the biggest nine-month
gain since records began in 1948; (note: earnings were down 65% in the
nine months ended in December 2008, the biggest such decrease on
record. The financials were a train wreck and in my opinion the firms
were coming off such a low basis that it’s easy to see a huge headline
increase. The jump in profits is definitely not evenly close to being
distributed evenly among banks, making it very less likely that the
money will find its way back into the economy in the form of loans
(Goldman will pay out $0.45+/- for every dollar in profit in bonuses
to their insiders).
On a side note….its
interesting to see that Goldman Sachs, which got $10 billion and debt
guarantees from the U.S. government in October 2008, is on pace for
the best year in the firm’s history and get this they are only
paying 1.0% in taxes!
Worse yet Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and
Morgan Stanley are looking to give
India over $1 billion in IT outsourcing contracts. Hell of a way
to thank American taxpayers and American workers.
Technically Speaking
Weekend
Weekly Analysis
11/30/2009
Even after the stunning stock market
losses people were suffering at this time last Thanksgiving and now we
can reflect on the tremendous gains the market has bestowed since the
March lows. Yet for those poor folks who closely watch the fate of
their money that they put into 401(k)/IRAs the gains of the past 12
months have failed to provide much solace. As folks who blindly
followed wall-streets advice and invested money at the start of this
decade in the SPX still have 25% less of it, excluding dividends of
course which have been evaporating an alarming rate! Many Americans
remain deeply worried about their money and have grown increasing
mistrustful of Wall Street and the government leaders entrusted to
watch over the financial systems.
This sentiment may weigh on the equity
markets in the future: I believe that this rally is very fragile, and
cash from individual investors and others is desperately needed to
build on it (what I so often refer to as a new round of bagholders).
After two 50+ percent sell-offs in the stock market in less than a
decade (Dot-Com bubble bursting and then the Credit-Debacle), a near
miss with anther depression and an unrelenting unemployment rate that
keeps crawling higher, folks do not feel safe at all to re-enter the
shark infested investment-cesspool, so where is the next round of
bagholders going to come from?
Those on the various
bubble-vision-networks want us to believe that in general investors
should be acting like they are on the top of the world after this
year's monster relief rally from the March lows. But as many Americans
stand back and compare the stock market rally to that of the actual
economy (the economy where they reside) an atmosphere of distrust as
once again those on Wall Street reap the huge rewards (made with
taxpayer and other people’s money) and the average American doesn't
get anything of substance once again; as such there is I believe a
growing sense of unfairness and bewilderment.
The reluctance to trust Wall Street and the stock market has shown up
in overall investing behavior. To observe individual investors, I like
to watch the flow of money in and out of mutual funds. During the
market downturn between October 2007 and March, investors pulled about
$215 billion out of U.S. stock funds, according to TrimTabs Investment
Research. And early in the current rally, investors put about $30
billion back into the stock funds…a huge disproportion of funds. But
since then, the money that went into the stock funds has been started
to be withdrawn, and investors have preferred the relatively
lower-risk bond funds, pouring in over $340 billion this year.
V OLUME on the
bullish side is worsening as the days wear on.....When
I see decisive breaks below the bottom boundary lines of Rising
Bearish Wedges for the Dow, SPX, and NDX I will be announcing that a
major/major top is occurring. I’m also seeing increased bearish
divergences between price and actual market breadth, price and volume,
and price and momentum indicators that I follow for longer-term
significant market moves. Please watch the weekly
MACD indicators which are showing
very distinct signs of respective topping patterns in the various
indexed and are now starting to curl over which is a very bearish
signal.
The concept behind MACD is fairly
straightforward. Essentially, it calculates the difference between an
instrument's 26-day and 12-day exponential moving averages (EMA). Of
the two moving averages that make up MACD, the 12-day EMA is obviously
the faster one, while the 26-day is slower one. In their calculation
both moving averages use the closing prices of whatever period is
measured, in the sector I watch for longer term moves (I use the
weekly chart). On the MACD chart, a nine-day EMA of MACD itself is
plotted as well, and it acts as a trigger for buy and sell decisions.
MACD generates a bullish signal when it moves above its own nine-day
EMA, and it sends a sell sign when it moves below its nine-day EMA.
Since
this bear-market leg has started we have experienced 2-distinct and
significant relief up-waves (wave 1 and 3 of a 5-wave pattern) and now
we are embroiled in what I believe is the third (wave 5) and last wave
up in this corrective pattern what I believe is a (B) wave up and I
believe we are very close to finishing this up-wave!
According to my wave analysis the 1st sub-wave of the (B)
corrective wave up was (a) which lasted 68-69 trading days from 3/6/09
to 6/11/2009….thereafter the second wave (b) down lasted from
approximately 6/11/209 to 7/8/2009 a mere 18-trading days….and this
was a very shallow retracement….here is the tricky part if wave (c-up
of the B up corrective wave) tops in the next 5-10 trading days
(likely in and around my next inflection period (11/6 to 11/13, we
have a weekend and a holiday Veterans day on the 11thin the
mix) it would mean that the (c) wave lasted approximately 68-up-days
plus 18-down-days or 86+/- days now not all Elliot-wave patterns are
exact-linear-counts but I would pay particular attention to the
11/9/2009 date as it would be 86-trading days from the 7/8/2009
bottom!
Now
for my bullish friends….I am issuing a serious red-flag-warning as if I’m
correct and I believe that I am, when the up-leg of this (B) relief
rally is completed…we will become embroiled in a very-nasty (many will
be in the land-of denial) plunge, and this will be the third leg of
this bear-market super-cycle-down-draft, and this plunge will catch
many if not all of the perma-bulls in a state of shock and utter
denial…I believe that history will be repeated and we will
unfortunately plunge our economy into a deep and protracted recession
(hopefully not another great-depression)
When
the U.S. stock market is flashing mixed and diverging signals like it
has been lately, I turn my attention to exploring for decent entry
prices for stocks that I wish to own (those with dividends and the
ability to write covered calls on, a process to generate additional income while I await
their consolidation and subsequent move higher. I'm looking at
the respective 100sma and more likely 200sma moving
averages as potential reversal points for the sell-off I'm expecting
to enter into reversal long-plays.
Remember, that when embroiled in a significant selling period when almost everything is being sold-hard, is when you
must be a contrarian investors and traders and pull out your favorite COF/MA/V stock-market credit cards and become buyers (we
also must be aware that the
wall-street-pickpockets/thieves for the most part....have a vested interest in running this
market into the end of the year if they can)
We want to
be very selective in our buys and not buy just any old hyped beta
stock. Prudent investors must do their research on the stocks they're
interested in buying, and then they snatch them up when the window of
opportunity is open and they are selling at a discount. I do the
majority of this research for my subscribers, so they can then focus
on what/when and how to buy.
The
market is driven by hedge funds, mutual funds and by mega large
trading desks (which I believe should be illegal) of the likes of
Government Sachs, MS, BAC and the like…and this past year along 33-40% of market
volume has been routinely attributed to program trading at
Goldman Sachs. I have no idea if that GS claim is true or not but like
an urban legend the story continues to make the rounds.
On a pull-back
I am looking for the
following retracements in the major indexes, and this is based on my
experience and technical analyst; remember that I did call the March
bottom several days in advance of the move. The indexes should as a minimum
retrace 25-33% of these recent parabolic moves, and they could easily
plunge to 50% of their lows hit in March
I have outlined the various retracement levels below.
|
Index |
Relative High |
March Low |
Spread |
Fib 23.6% |
Fib 38.2% |
Fib 50.0% |
Fib 61.80% |
Fib 76.40% |
|
Dow |
10,438.00 |
6,470.49 |
3,967.51 |
9,501.39 |
8,922.53 |
8,454.25 |
7,985.96 |
7,407.10 |
|
SPX-500 |
1,114.00 |
666.79 |
447.21 |
1,008.43 |
943.18 |
890.40 |
837.61 |
772.36 |
|
SPX-100 |
516.50 |
317.37 |
199.13 |
469.49 |
440.44 |
416.94 |
393.43 |
364.38 |
|
Nasdog |
2,204.00 |
1,265.62 |
938.38 |
1,982.48 |
1,845.57 |
1,734.81 |
1,624.05 |
1,487.14 |
|
NDX-100 |
1,814.20 |
1,040.62 |
773.58 |
1,631.58 |
1,518.72 |
1,427.41 |
1,336.10 |
1,223.24 |
|
Russell-2000 |
625.02 |
345.01 |
280.01 |
558.92 |
518.06 |
485.02 |
451.97 |
411.11 |
|
Transports |
4,059.00 |
2,134.31 |
1,924.69 |
3,604.64 |
3,323.83 |
3,096.66 |
2,869.48 |
2,588.67 |
|
SOX |
337.20 |
188.21 |
148.99 |
302.03 |
280.29 |
262.71 |
245.12 |
223.38 |
|
SPY |
111.69 |
67.10 |
44.59 |
101.16 |
94.66 |
89.40 |
84.13 |
77.63 |
|
DIA |
104.63 |
64.78 |
39.85 |
95.22 |
89.41 |
84.71 |
80.00 |
74.19 |
|
SMH |
26.92 |
15.64 |
11.28 |
24.26 |
22.61 |
21.28 |
19.95 |
18.30 |
|
OIH |
132.39 |
64.65 |
67.74 |
116.40 |
106.52 |
98.52 |
90.52 |
80.64 |
|
XLE |
60.56 |
37.40 |
23.16 |
55.09 |
51.71 |
48.98 |
46.25 |
42.87 |
|
XLF |
15.76 |
5.88 |
9.88 |
13.43 |
11.99 |
10.82 |
9.65 |
8.21 |
|
The
Dow lost
154.48 points on Friday and
only 8.24-points for the week....(so the downdraft was
centered almost entirely on Friday (we saw an intra-week high of
10,495+/-) before ending the week at 10,309.92 in a light volume environment
which was controlled by prop-desk-trading programs and
hedge-funds/mutual funds painting their books as they ready to close
them for the year.......Dubai's debt crisis rattled the world
financial markets Friday, raising concerns that some banks could
further tighten lending and stall the global economic recovery....The
possible spillover effects centered on fears that international banks
could suffer big losses if Dubai's investment arm defaulted on its $60
billion debt. Stock and commodity markets tumbled right from the
onset.....The
index ended the week at 10,309.92 and has
been on a parabolic ramp since the March 6th lows producing a stellar
rally of 3,850+/- or 60% in just
8+/- months a very remarkable parabolic bear-market relief rally
(I'm still expecting a pull back of 9-15% in the next several weeks from the
recent relative high of 10,439) looking for a test of the
9,050-9,125 level.....if we see subsequent selling on Monday....there is
little real support till we reach the 10,234 level the 21ema....we have
the weekly 50sma looming thereafter at 9,977+/- and thereafter (the October
2nd low of 9,430 is a pivotal level as well......If the bulls
return on Monday they will look to re-take 10375+/-
thereafter we have OHR at 10455 this is where the Dow
could run into significant OHR.


The DOW-Transports....was
a loser on Friday losing 49.48-points, and
for the week it lost 22.68 points
(the index closed out the week at 3,922.84)
and the index has breeched to the downside the 21Dema at 3925.00 (we
need to see if its only a temporary breech or something bigger!
Its
worth noting that the up-days are trading at 89% of the 30-day average
volume these past 2-weeks while the down days are trading 152% of the
30-day average volume, a bearish divergence worth watching....We closed right
below the weekly 100sma at 3980 and below
the daily 21ema at 3,924...we will find out on Monday which camp still
has the juice....the daily chart appears to have hit a triple top and
been repelled....a breech of 3,875 to the downside would be very
negative....and there would be little support till 3,750...on the weekly charts we are still on a
bearish confirmed rollover! If the
bulls somehow managed to muster some buying interest and return in a
buying mood on
Monday look for them to attempt to retake OHR 3,975 thereafter
4025 (we have a have brick wall of OHR 4,055) if crude prices continue to move
lower
in response to weaker economic conditions and or a stronger dollar the transports
could find some mixed tonality......if the bears return in a ravenous
mood; they will likely attempt to retest the the 3,750+/- level
thereafter there is support
thereafter 3,669-3,674 level if this level fails the bears will certainly have their sights on
3,500 level of significant support, the weekly chart which was in a
confirmed a sell-signal has turned to neutral! Please
note the longer-term charts are overbought
Transports Daily Chart
Transports Weekly Chart
The SPX was
hit hard on Friday as Dubai's debt crisis rattled world financial
markets Friday, raising concerns that some banks could further tighten
lending and stall the global economic recovery....the index was weak from
the get go (due to negative futures action) and it dropped 19.14-points
or 1.72% on Friday and but some how it manage to eke out a bullish
close for the week gaining 0.11 points to close out the week at
1,091.49, (well off the intraweek high of
112.38+/-) as I said before the index is
looking very tired here and we could be very close to a 14-21%
retracement cycle....markets do not move in a straight line so
even though I'm expecting a 14-21% correction from the highs (a drop of
150+/- points)....I would not expect it to come with out full-filling
a likely ABC corrective pattern......the SPX has been on a wild
parabolic rocket ride during the second quarter as the index had surged
434+/-
or 66% from the March lows.....as
I showed in the charts last week the
index appeared extremely top heavy and my propriety trading systems
were
again
flashing a multitude of negative volume divergences, and near-term
topping patterns (likely top 1,114-1,120).....I’m also seeing
increased bearish divergences between price and actual market breadth,
price and volume, and price and momentum indicators that I follow for
longer-term significant market moves. Please watch the weekly MACD
indicators which are showing signs of topping and are now starting to
curl over a very bearish signal. After this weeks whipsawing
reversal we
somewhat oversold near-term but on
the flip-side many of the charts are also sporting potential H&S patterns so we
could experience renewed selling on Monday if the bad-news-bears continue to smell blood
there is little real concrete support till 1070+/- (the 50Dsma = 1073.90)
the daily chart is also rolling over from overbought conditions and be
have a bearish Stochastic crossover both very negative near-term....
and the
weekly chart has established bearish crossovers and negative
divergences....so I
would be a cautious dip buyer in the zone of 1040-1050, for a near-term
oversold relief rally, maybe back to 1073+/- I warned you all
last week of
some renewed
volatility, as the weekly charts are still
displaying multiple negative divergences and they have signaled a SELL-signal (still in effect).....The weekly charts are close to
forming
the top side of a Diamond-topping pattern?. Diamond patterns usually
form over several months in very active markets. The Diamond
Top pattern occurs because prices create higher highs and lower lows
in a broadening pattern. Then the trading range gradually narrows
after the highs peak and the lows start trending upward. The Technical
Analysis occurs when prices break downward out of the diamond
formation?.....Consider the duration of the pattern and its
relationship to your trading time horizons! .
I still believe we could see a significant pullback as we have a
bearish crossover on the weekly charts, and a bearish drop out of the
rising wedge formation.



The
Nasdog
was a distinct loser on Friday dropping a whopping 37.61-points or
1.73% during a light volume shortened trading day where we
saw distinct
whipsawing
back and forth after the initial
gap-down due to the malaise centered around the debt issue in Dubai....for the week it lost
7.60-points
to close out the week at 2,138.44....as you can see that
the majority of the weakness was established on Friday.....the NDX-100...lost
28.21-points or 1.57% points on Friday (showing a tad bit more
strength than the Nasdog) as for the week it closed green by 1.07-points the week,
showing that profit taking was prevalent in the large cap sector.....closing out the week at
1765.46 (well off the 1801 intra-week high though)......the Nasdog/NDX were the
recent leaders of the relief rally off of the March lows and the main drivers of this bear-market
relief rally....and now they are displaying a multitude of negative
divergences and light volume rallies and heavy volume sell-offs....as I
said last week the respective P/E of the lead sled-dogs in the
technology environment are very stretched....priced
overly to perfection in my opinion!
If the bulls return in a buying
mood on Monday
they will attempt to regain the 2,149-2155
level of significant OHR on the Nasdog thereafter we have OHR now at
2,180-2184+/-...The charts are still displaying
a plethora of negative divergences......If the bears
return on Monday in a ravenous mood they will likely attempt
to de-horn the bulls and knock the stuffing out of them as they have
been bloodied significantly during the past several weeks on numerous
short-squeezes...as such the bears will look to take the index back down to
2,099-2105
thereafter we have support at the 2,055+/-level.




The
Russell-2000
was a loser on Friday, losing
14.98-points and this index needs to be watched very
closely as the negative divergences are still growing and expanding
and it has started to show some serious signs of
internal weakness as I have written about for several weeks now and
these divergences are weighing heavily on the small/mid-cap players
the speculative playground of mutual fund managers! and
it lost 7.47 points on the week closing out the week at
577.21....(since the high posted on 10-19-2009....624.13
this once "leader of the pack" has been a laggard....this index
is historically a speculative playground for the high beta-players and
growth speculators and like the Nasdog it
had been a stellar winner during the past 8-9+/- months relief rally.
The
index is
over-sold on a near-term basis....and is sitting right on the 100-Dsma
at 578.00. The
daily-chart is starting to roll-over and a breech of the 100Dsma could
result in the index dropping rapidly down to the 556-557 level. The bearish bias is still
prevalent as the weekly charts are still portraying a very-negative roll-over as after
we broke down through the rising wedge formation as I suggested we
would last week.
If the bulls return in a buying mood on Monday look for them to
assault the 587-590 level
thereafter 600+/-....if the bad-news bears return in a nasty selling mood on Monday they could
take this index down to 566-567
thereafter we have support at the 23.6% Fib retracement at 556+/-) from the
March lows to the October highs) after that we have support 544-545 level.
The weekly charts are displayed bearish-divergence patterns.
This is the fourth quarter and
small caps are supposed to be out performing. Instead they are under
performing. I have written this a dozen times in the past several
weeks but it is still true. This under performance is suggesting that
fund managers are still very skittish of the market. This is bearish
signal.


Dollar,
our precious
greenback
The U.S.
dollar has been enjoying a tiny respite from its declining trend over the
past two months, as evident on the dollar index chart. As
it bounced from the 74.24 level. We are
forming what I believe to be a perfect falling wedge pattern pattern,
which is a TYPICAL
reversal pattern...Only
time will tell

The dollar index has near-term solid
support at 73.50-74.00 and now since we saw a little fight to the
Dollar on Friday it needs to rally back up to and breech
the OHR at 77.00 and then I will call this rebound as a near-term
bull-market in the greenback....and look for a
run to 82.00+/- ....which could be a distinct sign of further
weakness for commodities and
energy stocks and precious metals,
and some small benefits for Americans)…and if this happens look for commodities to continue their near
term drop-off. As I said
last week I have seen similar consolidation patterns on the EUR/USD
and the AUD/USD, and both appeared to be ready for a near-term to be readying for a breakout to the
upside. However if we see additional geopolitical instability, the dollar
strength could surge hard and a break out of the dollar index above 80.00
would
indicate a near-term trend change, and generate a massive short
squeeze in the greenback!.
Note;
When I generally think about the
government’s exploding debt levels, I don’t generally focus on
interest payments….but I took a few minutes and did just that this
weekend and its staggering. Those payments will likely total $4.8
trillion over the next 10 years (payments we are leaving future
generations). Right now thanks to the easy money policies at the Fed
interest rates are near zero, thanks to the Federal Reserve’s massive
monetary stimulus; but at some point the Fed will have to reverse this
easing and wow what a problem out debt will face. When interest rates
rise, even a small amount, the interest payments go up a lot because
of the size of the massive humungous debt-level. We’re in hock as a
nation like never before. Neither the administration nor Congress has
any plan to change that and we will likely lose our leadership status
as a result of it; and both the actual and hidden costs of our debt
are rising every day.

Bubble bubble toil and trouble…..The
Obama administration is working hard to spin its current monetary
policy to the American people (who for the most part are financially
ignorant) as is Congress, so they are able to spin the rhetoric as a
reasonable effort to jump-start the nation’s economy and avoid a deep
recession or depression, their efforts so far….put free/easy money
into the hands of those responsible for the credit debacle and they
will right their wrongs (what a fare) they have for the most part
failed to get stimulus money into the hands of those who consume! So
far their approach has included monetization via a near zero Federal
Funds rate and so-called quantitative easing in which the numbnuts at
the central bank have purchased short-term assets such as federal debt
securities and corporate bonds from banks and other lenders using
money that it has effectively printed like monopoly money. Their
rationale and plan was to increase the overall money supply by
encouraging lenders to extend debt (which they have not to date) while
simultaneously decreasing the cost of borrowing. In this way the
government hoped to stimulate the economy. Of course the contagion
that lurks behind this ponzi scheme is that there is no guarantee that
the lecherous lenders will actually lend (so far they have not been
doing so) their funds….instead they have been simply padding their
trading accounts and increasing their deteriorating reserves.
This irresponsible tactic of their
*called economic policy* in my opinion has produced a tidal wave of
financial outflows into foreign equities and financial assets, and
that outflow is intermingling with similar resource flows emanating
from every other nation who has also engaged in a similar stimulus
program. Granted, this economic outflow has also a stimulated a
massive inflow of capital via an accumulation of foreign exchange
reserves from international central banks and has financed the
ever-growing federal deficits. However, this policy has likewise
contributed to a Hindenburg ballooning stock market bubble across the
globe especially in the U.S. and has fueled a very dangerously and
likely a very volatile asset bubble in various commodities! Recently
the head of China’s central bank sounded the alarm regarding the
dangers of the various ballooning asset bubbles, as is the
International Money Fund, the World Bank and central banks around the
globe; after recently been burned by the asset bubble created by the
lecherous lending practices of banks within the U.S. housing market.
|
Economic Releases for the Week of 11/30/2009 |
|
Date |
ET |
Release |
For |
Consensus |
Prior |
|
November 30 |
09:45 |
Chicago PMI |
Nov |
53.0 |
54.2 |
|
December 01 |
10:00 |
Construction Spending |
Oct |
0.4% |
0.8% |
|
December 01 |
10:00 |
ISM Manufacturing Index |
Nov |
54.8 |
55.7 |
|
December 01 |
10:00 |
Pending Home Sales |
Oct |
0.5% |
6.1% |
|
December 01 |
14:00 |
Auto Sales |
Nov |
NA |
NA |
|
December 01 |
14:00 |
Truck Sales |
Nov |
NA |
NA |
|
December 02 |
07:30 |
Challenger Job Cuts |
Nov |
NA |
50.7% |
|
December 02 |
08:15 |
ADP Employment Report |
Nov |
148,000 |
-203,000 |
|
December 02 |
10:30 |
Crude Inventories |
11/27 |
NA |
1.02M |
|
December 02 |
14:00 |
Fed Beige Book |
Nov |
|
|
|
December 03 |
08:30 |
Initial Claims |
11/28 |
483K |
466K |
|
December 03 |
08:30 |
Continuing Claims |
11/21 |
5517K |
5423K |
|
December 03 |
08:30 |
Productivity-Revision |
Q3 |
8.5% |
9.5% |
|
December 03 |
08:30 |
Employment Cost Index |
Q3 |
NA |
0.4% |
|
December 03 |
10:00 |
ISM Services |
Nov |
51.5 |
50.6 |
|
December 04 |
08:30 |
Nonfarm
Payrolls |
Nov |
114,000 |
190,000 |
|
December 04 |
08:30 |
Unemployment Rate |
Nov |
10.2% |
10.2% |
|
December 04 |
08:30 |
Average Workweek |
Nov |
33.1 |
33.0 |
|
December 04 |
08:30 |
Hourly Earnings |
Nov |
0.2% |
0.3% |
|
December 04 |
10:00 |
Factory Orders |
Oct |
0.1% |
0.9% |
|